In plain language
In 40 iliac vein stenting procedures guided by intravascular ultrasound at one center, fluoroscopy time and air kerma were low, and higher with more stents. Staff dose was not measured directly, so implications for the fluoroscopy team are inferred.
At a glance
- Type of study
- Original research, Retrospective cohort study
- Who was studied
- Patients, Vascular surgeons
- Size
- n = 40 procedures
- Summary based on
- the abstract
What it found
Iliac vein stenting with intravascular ultrasound used low fluoroscopy time and air kerma.
Key figures: mean fluoroscopy time 76.5 s; mean cumulative air kerma 1.08 mGy
Placing more than one stent was associated with higher cumulative air kerma.
Key figures: 1.44 vs. 1.02 mGy; p = 0.04
Fluoroscopy time was longer when more than one stent was placed.
Key figures: 120.1 vs. 68.8 s; p = 0.0004
Patient-worn abdominal badge recorded a low deep dose equivalent per procedure.
Key figures: 0.221 mSv
Limits to keep in mind
Small single-center retrospective series of 40 procedures with a mobile C-arm and no comparison group; dosimeters were worn by patients, so operator dose was not directly measured.
Related research summaries
- Radiation Awareness for EVAR in Hybrid Operating Room: An Instant Operator Risk Chart (2021, Dosimetry measurement study)
- Comparison of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease with Flat-Panel Detectors on Mobile C-arm versus Fixed Systems (2017, Prospective cohort study)
- Evaluating Strategies For Reducing Scattered Radiation In Fixed-Imaging Hybrid Operating Suites (2017, Prospective cohort study)
- Modern Fixed Imaging Systems Reduce Radiation Exposure To Patients And Providers (2017, Retrospective cohort study)
- New Image-Processing And Noise-Reduction Software Reduces Radiation Dose During Complex Endovascular Procedures (2016, Retrospective cohort study)
How this summary was made
ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.
Prepared November 3, 2026.