Research summary, original research, 2019

Pattern and degree of radiation exposure during endovascular surgery performed using a mobile C-arm or in a hybrid room

Quan C, Lee SS. Annals of surgical treatment and research. 2019

Read the original paper

In plain language

In one vascular surgeon's 81 endovascular procedures, a mobile C-arm gave higher upper-body doses, especially right neck and shoulder, while the hybrid room with a ceiling screen gave higher lower-body doses. Dosimeter readings, not health outcomes.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Dosimetry measurement study
Who was studied
Vascular surgeons
Size
n = 81 procedures
Where
South Korea
Summary based on
the full text

What it found

  • Dose at the lower part of the protective apron was much higher in the hybrid room than with the mobile C-arm.

    Key figures: 8.43 mSv vs. 2.74 mSv

  • With the mobile C-arm, right neck and shoulder doses were higher than left side and higher than in the hybrid room.

    Key figures: 1.77 mSv and 1.48 mSv vs. 0.88 mSv and 0.20 mSv

  • The suspended lead screen in the hybrid room attenuated dose by an estimated 85.6%.

    Key figures: 0.18 mSv surgeon side vs 1.25 mSv patient side; 85.6% attenuation

  • Fluoroscopy time and dose-area product (DAP) did not differ significantly between groups, though DAP per second appeared higher in the hybrid room.

    Key figures: 4.5 µGym2/sec vs. 3.1 µGym2/sec

  • With the C-arm, the chest had the highest dose among body sites.

    Key figures: 2.83 mSv

Limits to keep in mind

Single surgeon at a single center, non-randomized sequential groups, with dosimeters worn outside protective equipment; differences in body-site doses were described without statistical testing and room comparison is confounded by screen use.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the full text of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.