Research summary, guideline or consensus statement

ICRP Draft - Radiological Protection in Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures

Open the source page

In plain language

This 2011 International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) draft guidance reports that surgeons, urologists, gastroenterologists, anaesthetists, nurses and radiographers using fluoroscopy outside imaging departments often lack radiation protection training and dose monitoring. It recommends specialty-oriented training, dosimetry, eye protection and operating-theatre shielding screens.

At a glance

Type of study
Guideline or consensus statement
Who was studied
Vascular surgeons, Orthopedic surgeons, Urologists, Gastroenterologists, Anesthesia staff, Other physicians, Nurses, Radiologic technologists, Trainees, Patients
Summary based on
a web page

What it found

  • Physicians using fluoroscopy outside radiology departments mostly have minimal or no radiation protection training and may lack access to medical physicists; nurses and radiographers in these settings have limited skills and awareness.

  • Personal dosimeters are not used, or are used irregularly, by some professionals, so occupational doses in several practices outside radiology are largely unknown.

  • Radiation levels in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair by vascular surgeons are similar to those in interventional radiology and cardiology, and several procedures can give patient skin doses above 1 Gy.

    Key figures: >1 Gy skin dose

  • Reports of lens opacities in staff who use fluoroscopy point to a need for stronger eye protection.

  • Radiation shielding screens for staff in operating theatres are recommended wherever feasible; many operating-theatre fluoroscopy machines lack screens and flaps.

Limits to keep in mind

Draft consultation guidance based on expert opinion rather than new data; only the opening chapters were available, so specialty-specific dose data and recommendations could not be reviewed.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from a web page of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.