Research summary, original research, 2014

Occupational Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Aortic Repair

Sailer AM, Schurink GW, Bol ME, de Haan MW, van Zwam WH, Wildberger JE, et al.. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2014

Read the original paper

In plain language

Across 44 endovascular aortic repairs, first operators received about four times the dose of second operators, and the most dose during complex fenestrated or branched repairs. Higher dose area product, more contrast and steep left-anterior angulation predicted higher operator dose.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Dosimetry measurement study
Who was studied
Vascular surgeons, Other physicians, Radiologic technologists, Nurses, Anesthesia staff
Size
n = 44 procedures
Summary based on
the abstract

What it found

  • First operator dose was significantly higher during fenestrated/branched repair (FEVAR) than during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

    Key figures: 0.34 ± 0.28 mSv (FEVAR) vs 0.11 ± 0.21 mSv (EVAR) and 0.06 ± 0.05 mSv (TEVAR); p = 0.003

  • First operators received about four times the dose of second operators; other staff received lower doses.

    Key figures: FO 0.17 ± 0.21 mSv; SO 0.042 ± 0.045 mSv; RT 0.019; SN 0.017; AN 0.006; NSN 0.004 mSv

  • First operator dose correlated with procedural dose area product and iodinated contrast volume.

    Key figures: Dose-area product (DAP) R = 0.69, p < 0.001; contrast R = 0.67, p < 0.001

  • Left-anterior C-arm projections greater than 60° were associated with higher first operator dose; fluoroscopy time correlated only weakly.

    Key figures: p = 0.02; fluoroscopy time R = 0.40, p = 0.049

  • Second operator and anesthesiologist doses were strongly correlated with first operator dose.

    Key figures: p = 0.003 and p < 0.001

Limits to keep in mind

Small single-series study of 44 procedures using a single over-lead chest dosimeter per person, so doses to unshielded areas such as the lens and hands were not captured; only apron and thyroid collar were used, and the country and centre are not stated in the abstract.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.