Research summary, systematic review or meta-analysis, 2024

Literacy in the Scope of Radiation Protection for Healthcare Professionals Exposed to Ionizing Radiation: A Systematic Review

Rodrigues BV, Lopes PC, Mello-Moura AC, Flores-Fraile J, Veiga N. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). 2024

Read the original paper

In plain language

Across 12 surveys of nurses, radiographers, surgeons, cardiologists, dentists and other clinicians, self-reported radiation protection knowledge was generally poor and protective equipment was not always used. The authors call for standardized national training.

At a glance

Type of study
Systematic review or meta-analysis, Systematic review
Who was studied
Other physicians, Nurses, Radiologic technologists, Orthopedic surgeons, Other surgeons, Interventional cardiologists, Anesthesia staff
Size
n = 12 studies
Summary based on
the full text

What it found

  • Twelve cross-sectional survey studies were included from 566 screened references; most reported poor radiation safety knowledge among healthcare professionals.

    Key figures: 566 references; 12 articles

  • Protective equipment was available in all studies, but not all professionals used it.

  • Staff with fewer years of experience showed more limited attitudes and behaviour toward radiation protection, linked to lack of training.

  • Knowledge of regulatory legislation on radiation safety was unsatisfactory; dosimetry knowledge and use were mixed, with one study reporting only half of professionals used dosimeters.

  • The authors recommend a standardized national radiation protection training program tailored to each profession.

Limits to keep in mind

All 12 included studies were self-report surveys with variable handling of confounding, and results were summarized narratively without pooled quantitative data. The review mixes dentists and other non-fluoroscopy groups with OR and cardiology staff.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the full text of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.