Research summary, original research, 2025

Development of radioprotective side shield attached to radioprotective glasses for reducing eye lens dose of endoscopists during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a phantom study

Fukushima K, Yamaguchi K, Matsubara K. Radiological physics and technology. 2025

Read the original paper

In plain language

In a phantom simulating endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), a light side shield clipped onto radioprotective glasses cut eye lens air kerma by roughly 40-90% compared with glasses alone. This is a dosimetry result; real-world comfort and use by endoscopists were not tested.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Phantom or simulation study
Who was studied
Gastroenterologists, Phantom or simulation (no people)
Where
Japan
Summary based on
the full text

What it found

  • The final side shield (3 layers, 8 cm front, 6 cm rear) reduced lens-surface air kerma compared with radioprotective glasses alone across phantom heights and body rotation angles.

    Key figures: 48.2-87.3% dose reduction

  • At 165 cm phantom height, average ocular air kerma fell from no protection to glasses alone to glasses plus side shield.

    Key figures: 0.134, 0.073 and 0.019 mGy

  • Estimated number of weekly ERCPs within the 20 mSv/yr lens limit increased with the side shield.

    Key figures: 1, 2 and 10 examinations per week

  • Stacking three or more sheets gave dose reduction above 80%; more than three sheets added little.

    Key figures: >80% with ≥3 sheets

  • With glasses alone, lens dose rose as the phantom rotated toward the monitor, but the side shield kept it near 0.02 mGy regardless of angle.

    Key figures: approximately 0.02 mGy

Limits to keep in mind

Phantom study with one over-couch fluoroscopy system, one set of exposure conditions, fixed postures and only two glasses models; comfort, visual field, cleaning and compliance were not assessed, and backscatter may have overestimated Hp(3).

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the full text of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.