In plain language
In a phantom simulating coronary intervention, a lightweight patient drape with a detachable shielding wall cut measured scatter dose by 70-80% at operator eye and hand positions, though protection varied with projection angle. Clinical staff dose was not measured.
At a glance
- Type of study
- Original research, Phantom or simulation study
- Who was studied
- Phantom or simulation (no people)
- Topics
- Room shielding and protective devicesPersonal protective equipmentEye lens and cataractsDosimetry and monitoring
- Summary based on
- the abstract
What it found
The drape with detachable shielding wall reduced dose by 70-80% at the forward-leaning eye lens and hand positions.
Key figures: 70-80%
Adding the shielding wall gave more protection than the drape alone.
Shielding effect depended on projection angle and was limited at the eye lens position for some left anterior oblique (LAO) and caudal projections.
Vertical and forward-tilted wall configurations did not differ significantly.
The device is lightweight with low lead equivalence.
Key figures: 0.125 mmPb; 938 g
Limits to keep in mind
Phantom study using ambient dose equivalent during simulated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), not personal dosimetry on staff in real procedures; abstract only, without detailed statistics.
Related research summaries
- Body Surface Radiation Exposure in Interventional Echocardiographers During Structural Heart Disease Procedures (2023, Dosimetry measurement study)
- Mobile Head CT with Integrated Radiation Shielding Reduces the Need for Additional Personal Protective Equipment (2026, Dosimetry measurement study)
- Occupational radiation exposure and radiation protection practices in interventional radiology and cardiology: A multicenter study in France (2026, Retrospective cohort study)
- Radiation Exposure of Patients and Interventional Radiologists during Prostatic Artery Embolization: A Prospective Single-Operator Study (2017, Dosimetry measurement study)
- EFFICACY OF AN ADDITIONAL MOBILE LEADED SHIELD ON OPERATOR RADIATION DURING PERCUTANEOUS (2016, Dosimetry measurement study)
How this summary was made
ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.
Prepared November 3, 2026.