In plain language
In a phantom model of lateral fluoroscopy for posterior spinal fusion, the primary surgeon position had the highest scatter dose, followed by the scrub nurse. Estimated annual lens-height dose to the surgeon approached or exceeded the 20 mSv limit without eyewear.
At a glance
- Type of study
- Original research, Phantom or simulation study
- Who was studied
- Orthopedic surgeons, Nurses, Anesthesia staff, Radiologic technologists, Phantom or simulation (no people)
- Where
- Japan
- Topics
- Dosimetry and monitoringEye lens and cataractsThyroidPregnancy and reproductive healthPersonal protective equipment
- Summary based on
- the full text
What it found
The primary surgeon position received the highest scatter dose at all three heights.
Key figures: 27.2 μGy/min (80 cm), 38.8 μGy/min (100 cm), 36.3 μGy/min (150 cm)
The scrub nurse was the second most exposed position, receiving more than the first assistant at gonad and torso heights despite the assistant being closer to the equipment.
Key figures: 9-12 μGy/min at any height
The first assistant had low doses at 80 and 100 cm but a high dose at lens/thyroid height.
Key figures: 16.8 μGy/min at 150 cm; 3.8 and 2.8 μGy/min at 80 and 100 cm
Estimated annual lens-height dose for the primary surgeon, based on about 4 min fluoroscopy per case and 150 cases per year, could exceed the 20 mSv lens limit without protective eyewear.
Key figures: 21.78 mGy per year at 150 cm
Anesthesiologists, circulating nurses and radiologic technologists were in the low-dose range, but almost no part of the room had zero dose.
Key figures: ≤1 μGy/min
Limits to keep in mind
Single phantom measurement with one lateral fluoroscopy setup over 1 minute, not during real surgery, and without protective equipment in place; annual estimates rest on one hospital's fluoroscopy times.
Related research summaries
- AST Standards for Ionizing Radiation Exposure (Guideline or consensus statement)
- Radiation exposure in interventional cardiology: a narrative review of health effects and novel approaches to ensure radiation safety (2025, Narrative review)
- Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology (2022, Narrative review)
- Occupational Risks of Chronic Low Dose Radiation Exposure in Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory (2013, Narrative review)
- ICRP Draft - Radiological Protection in Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures (Guideline or consensus statement)
How this summary was made
ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the full text of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.
Prepared November 3, 2026.