In plain language
In interventional radiology, toe doses for radiologists were higher than expected, with two of four projected near 110 mSv a year. Table curtains reduced lower-leg exposure but left toes partly exposed, especially with gaps below the curtain.
At a glance
- Type of study
- Original research, Dosimetry measurement study
- Who was studied
- Interventional radiologists, Phantom or simulation (no people)
- Size
- n = 4 radiologists (in situ toe monitoring)
- Summary based on
- the abstract
What it found
In situ monitoring projected annual toe doses near the 150 mSv classification threshold for two of four radiologists.
Key figures: 110 mSv annual toe dose
Protective under-table curtains reduced exposure to most of the lower extremities.
Toe doses were high and rose as couch height increased.
Curtains may not fully protect the toes, especially when there is a gap below them; stepping back from the couch is advised.
Authors recommend including lower legs and toes in local radiation protection programmes.
Limits to keep in mind
Only four radiologists were monitored for 7 weeks, with annual doses extrapolated; much of the data come from ionization chamber and phantom measurements, and the abstract gives few quantitative details.
Related research summaries
- Investigating Medical Radiation Awareness of Saudi Arabian Cardiologists in Catheterization Labs: (2026, Cross-sectional survey)
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of a tunnel-shaped radiation shielding system in CT-guided interventions: Reduction of scattered radiation in phantom experiment (2025, Phantom or simulation study)
- Occupational radiation exposure of radiologic technologists in Interventional neuroradiology (2025, Dosimetry measurement study)
- Reduced radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory with a novel vertical radiation shield (2019, Prospective cohort study)
- Technical Note: Assessment Of Scatter Originating From The X-Ray Tube Collimator Assembly Of Modern Angiography Systems (2019, Phantom or simulation study)
How this summary was made
ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.
Prepared November 5, 2026.