Research summary, guideline or consensus statement, 1998

AAPM Report 58 - Managing the Use of Fluoroscopy in Medical Institutions

1998

Open the source page

In plain language

This 1998 American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) task group report advises hospitals to credential and train physicians who use fluoroscopy, monitor patient doses and fluoroscopy times through quality programs, and teach time, distance and shielding to reduce exposure for the fluoroscopy team and patients.

At a glance

Type of study
Guideline or consensus statement
Who was studied
Other physicians, Radiologic technologists, Medical physicists and radiation safety officers, Nurses, Patients
Where
United States
Summary based on
a web page

What it found

  • Non-radiologist specialists using fluoroscopy often lack radiation safety training, creating potential for excessive exposure to personnel and patients.

  • Recommends mandatory credentialing of physicians using fluoroscopy, with demonstrated competency via exam or continuing medical education (CME) and annual refresher training.

    Key figures: annual refresher

  • Scatter to unshielded personnel at one foot from the patient is roughly 1/100 of patient skin exposure.

    Key figures: 1/100

  • Distance and shielding: one step back cuts exposure rate about fourfold; 0.5 mm lead aprons attenuate scatter by about 20-fold.

    Key figures: factor of 4; factor of 20

  • Proposes a Plan-Do-Check-Act quality management program logging fluoroscopy times by procedure and physician, with quarterly analysis, involving physicists, fluoroscopists, nurses and technologists.

Limits to keep in mind

Expert task-group guidance from 1998 without original data; some dose figures are rules of thumb and contain apparent unit typos, and equipment and dose limits are now dated. Source text was truncated.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from a web page of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.