Research summary, guideline or consensus statement, 2022

AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 12.a - Fluoroscopy Dose Management

Fisher RF, Applegate KE, Berkowitz LK, Christianson O, Dave JK, DeWeese L, et al.. Journal of applied clinical medical physics. 2022

Read the original paper

In plain language

This US medical physics guideline recommends cumulative air kerma for patient dose alerts (first at 3 Gy, then every 1 Gy), follow-up above 5 Gy, and single collar-badge monitoring with lens dose assessment for the fluoroscopy team.

At a glance

Type of study
Guideline or consensus statement
Who was studied
Medical physicists and radiation safety officers, Patients, Interventional radiologists, Interventional cardiologists, Vascular surgeons, Radiologic technologists, Nurses, Anesthesia staff, Mixed lab staff
Where
United States
Summary based on
the full text

What it found

  • Cumulative air kerma (Ka,r) is recommended as the primary dose index for setting notification and patient follow-up thresholds.

  • Consensus intra-procedural notification levels start at 3 Gy Ka,r, with further notifications every 1 Gy Ka,r.

    Key figures: first at 3 Gy Ka,r; every 1 Gy thereafter

  • Suggested SRDL for post-procedure patient follow-up is 5 Gy Ka,r or 3 Gy PSD, with doses summed over a 60-day window.

    Key figures: 5 Gy Ka,r or 3 Gy PSD; 60 days

  • A single collar badge with personal protective equipment (PPE) correction is recommended for fluoroscopically guided interventional (FGI) staff because double badging is often misused; over a third of two-badge entries were invalid in a large review.

    Key figures: over a third of entries invalid

  • Lens dose should be assessed; a prior large study found over 15% of workers exceeded the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 20 mSv/year lens limit.

    Key figures: over 15%; 20 mSv/year

Limits to keep in mind

Consensus practice guideline based on expert opinion and cited literature rather than new data; it focuses mainly on patient tissue reactions, with occupational monitoring covered only briefly.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the full text of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.