The Evidence
Resources
Clinician AssessmentGet Your Risk Score FAQs Admin ToolkitMembers Economic Impact Research ArticlesMembers SIRP 2025 WebinarMembers Videos
Guidelines
What is ALARA+? US Guidelines International Guidelines News Is Not Here About Contact Donate
Join Free

Please double-check this information. This is an ORSIF research summary, researched November 3, 2026. It is not comprehensive and not always accurate: rules change, and answers may be incomplete, out of date or wrong. It is education, not legal advice. Not yet reviewed by a regulatory expert. Confirm each requirement at the source linked beside the answer, with the state program and with your facility's radiation safety officer. How this was made

In brief

ORSIF's research identified the Washington State Department of Health (DOH), Office of Radiation Protection as the agency that regulates X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment in Washington. Washington is a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Agreement State: it has signed an agreement with the NRC to regulate certain radioactive materials itself.

In Washington, explicit ALARA language is in the shared radiation protection standards (ch. 246-221 WAC) but is addressed to specific licensees. X-ray registrants must use procedures and equipment designed to minimize patient and personnel exposure. Fluoroscopy workers share the materials dose limits: 50 mSv whole body, 150 mSv lens, 500 mSv skin and extremities, and 5 mSv embryo/fetus. Everyone working in a fluoroscopy room must wear a collar dosimeter outside the apron and be shielded by aprons or whole-body barriers of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent. Thyroid shields, eyewear and apron inspections are not required. Licensed practitioners, certified radiologic technologists and registered X-ray technicians may operate X-ray equipment. A DOH rewrite of the fluoroscopy rules is at the draft stage.

The rules, question by question

Every answer names the rule it comes from. Open "Rule text and source" to read the citation, the source page and, where it could be matched, the exact wording.

Where the rules live

Which rules apply, and whether ALARA is among them.

Is Washington an NRC Agreement State?

Yes

Yes, per the NRC list (41 Agreement States; Washington is not on the non-Agreement list).

Rule text and source
Rule
NRC list of Agreement States, updated October 29, 2026
Source
nrc.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Which rules cover X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment in Washington?

YesCheck the source

Chapter 246-225 WAC, "Radiation Protection - X-Rays in the Healing Arts". General requirements are in WAC 246-225-020 and fluoroscopy rules in WAC 246-225-050. Chapter 246-221 WAC (Radiation Protection Standards) applies to both licensees and registrants. Related chapters are 246-220 and 246-222. WAC 246-225-020 was last amended in 1994 and WAC 246-225-050 effective 1/9/94.

Rule text and source
Rule
WAC 246-221-001(1); ch. 246-225 WAC
Source
apps.leg.wa.gov
app.leg.wa.gov
app.leg.wa.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Does Washington require X-ray users to keep doses as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)?

UnclearCheck the source

No explicit ALARA requirement for occupational dose addressed to X-ray registrants was found. WAC 246-221-005 and 246-220-007 are addressed to licensees. Registrants must use procedures and equipment "designed to minimize patient and personnel exposure" (WAC 246-225-020(2)(l)). DOH's practice is unconfirmed.

Where ALARA lives in Washington: In a shared rule and in X-ray-specific language. Explicit ALARA text is in the shared chapters (246-221-005, 246-220-007) and is worded for licensees. The X-ray-specific registrant duty is the "minimize... personnel exposure" language in 246-225-020(2)(l), which does not use the term ALARA. Dose limits and monitoring rules followed by registrants sit in the shared chapter. (WAC 246-220-007; WAC 246-221-005; WAC 246-225-020(2)(l))

Rule text and source
Rule
WAC 246-221-005(1)-(2); WAC 246-220-007; WAC 246-225-020(2)(l)
Source
apps.leg.wa.gov
app.leg.wa.gov
apps.leg.wa.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Dose limits

The annual limits for workers, written in millisieverts (mSv). Ten mSv equal one rem.

What is the annual whole-body dose limit in Washington?

Yes

50 mSv (5 rem) TEDE per year. Alternative organ limit is 500 mSv.

Rule text and source
Rule
WAC 246-221-010(1)
Source
apps.leg.wa.gov
What it says
The total effective dose equivalent being equal to 0.05 Sv (five rem)
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What is the annual eye-lens dose limit in Washington?

Yes

150 mSv (15 rem) per year. Washington has not adopted a lower limit such as 20 mSv.

Rule text and source
Rule
WAC 246-221-010(1)
Source
apps.leg.wa.gov
What it says
A lens dose equivalent of 0.15 Sv (15 rem)
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What limit applies to a declared pregnant worker in Washington?

Yes

5 mSv (0.5 rem) to the embryo/fetus of a declared pregnant woman over the whole pregnancy.

Rule text and source
Rule
WAC 246-221-055(1)
Source
apps.leg.wa.gov
What it says
does not exceed five mSv (0.5 rem).
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Dosimeters

When a worker must wear a dosimeter, and where.

When must a worker in Washington wear a dosimeter?

Yes

Generally, adults likely to exceed 10% of the annual limits must be monitored, and declared pregnant women likely to exceed 1 mSv. For fluoroscopy, everyone operating a fluoroscope or working in the room during operation must wear a dosimeter regardless of expected dose. Extremity dosimeters are required if the hands could be exposed to the primary beam.

Rule text and source
Rule
WAC 246-221-090(1)(a),(c); WAC 246-225-020(2)(i)(iv)
Source
apps.leg.wa.gov
apps.leg.wa.gov
What it says
All persons involved in the operation of a fluoroscope and working within the fluoroscopy room during its operation shall wear a personnel dosimeter required under WAC 246-221-090
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Where must the dosimeter be worn in Washington when a protective apron is worn?

YesCheck the source

The badge is worn at the collar outside the apron. Lens monitoring uses the collar or an unshielded spot nearer the eye. The fetal badge goes at the waist under the apron. Two badges are allowed if each is labeled by body location. Deep-dose equivalent is used unless an NRC- or DOH-approved effective dose method is used; no named method appears in the rule text.

Rule text and source
Rule
WAC 246-225-020(2)(i)(i)-(ii); WAC 246-221-090(7); WAC 246-221-010(3)
Source
apps.leg.wa.gov
apps.leg.wa.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Aprons and alternatives

Protective apparel, how it is checked, and whether other systems are addressed.

Must staff in Washington fluoroscopy rooms wear protective aprons or other apparel?

In part

Aprons or whole-body barriers of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent are required, and at least 0.5 mm for body parts in the useful beam. Fluoroscopy scatter drapes or curtains of at least 0.25 mm are required in addition. Thyroid shields and eyewear are not required by name, but DOH may require additional protective devices.

Rule text and source
Rule
WAC 246-225-020(2)(e)(i),(ii),(iv); WAC 246-225-050(8)
Source
apps.leg.wa.gov
app.leg.wa.gov
What it says
The X-ray operator, other staff and ancillary personnel shall be protected from the direct scatter radiation by protective aprons or whole body protective barriers of not less than 0.25 mm lead equivalent
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Do the rules in Washington address engineered protection systems used in place of aprons?

In partLess certain

Engineered radiation protection systems are not addressed by name. The current rule allows whole-body protective barriers instead of aprons. The draft rules would keep barrier options and add a variance process (WAC 246-225B-080); these draft provisions are not law.

Rule text and source
Rule
WAC 246-225-020(2)(e)(ii) (current); draft WAC 246-225B-025(12)(b), -035(5) (proposed)
Source
doh.wa.gov
What it says
Personnel in the procedure room must wear at least 0.25 millimeter lead equivalent apron or stand behind a protective barrier while in the procedure room, unless operating the system from a protected control booth.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

About ALARA+

Who operates the equipment

Who may use fluoroscopy equipment and what training the rules ask for.

Who may operate fluoroscopy equipment in Washington?

Yes

A health care practitioner licensed under Title 18 RCW, a certified radiologic technologist, or a registered X-ray technician. Radiologist assistants may operate fluoroscopy under general supervision, with direct supervision for listed exams. Only licensed practitioners may authorize exposure. The draft rule would require operation by a licensed health care provider.

Rule text and source
Rule
WAC 246-225-020(2)(b)(ii); WAC 246-926-300; WAC 246-926-020(5)-(6)
Source
apps.leg.wa.gov
app.leg.wa.gov
What it says
A medical X-ray machine operator shall be licensed, certified or registered by the department as either: (A) A health care practitioner, licensed under Title 18 RCW; or (B) A diagnostic or therapeutic radiologic technologist certified in accordance with chapter 18.84 RCW; or (C) An X-ray technician registered
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What training or credentials does Washington require to operate fluoroscopy equipment?

In part

There is no state fluoroscopy permit and no required physician training hours were found. Operators must be adequately instructed and able to demonstrate competence. Technologists need the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) exam, and their scope includes fluoroscopic procedures. No continuing education requirement was found. The draft rule would require annual training that includes ALARA.

Rule text and source
Rule
WAC 246-225-020(2)(b)(i); WAC 246-926-095(1), -135(1), -155(1)(e); draft WAC 246-225B-085
Source
apps.leg.wa.gov
app.leg.wa.gov
What it says
Individuals operating the X-ray equipment shall be adequately instructed in safe operating procedures and shall be able to demonstrate competence, upon request from the department, in the correct use of the equipment.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Changes on the way, and recent ones

Rules, bills and guidance the research found from 2025 and 2026, with the ones that touch fluoroscopy teams first.

  • Adopted ruleWSR 25-16-010

    Effective August 24, 2025

    Amended chapter 246-926 for MRI technologists.

  • Proposed ruleX-rays in the Healing Arts rewrite (chapter 246-225; new fluoroscopy chapter 246-225B)

    Draft stage. CR-101 filed January 24, 2024 and draft rules posted (file dated 2025-12). No CR-102 seen.

    Would replace the all-persons badge rule with dosimetry for operators and patient-care staff using Class 2-4 systems. Would require a 0.25 mm apron and thyroid shield or a whole-body barrier. Would add a radiation safety program, dose benchmarks and annual staff training.

    Source: doh.wa.gov

  • BillHB 2113 (Chapter 10, Laws of 2026)

    Enacted; effective June 11, 2026

    Covers supervision of radiologic technologists, including IV contrast. Clarifies that licensed practitioners, including ARNPs, may supervise. Seen only in search snippets.

    Source: app.leg.wa.gov

1 other item the research logged (radiation therapy, industrial machines, fees and other subjects)
  • OtherFederally Required Chapter Updates, Chapter 246-221, -231, -237, and -240 WAC

    Listed as active rulemaking; content and status unknown

    Page could not be opened.

    Source: doh.wa.gov

Also worth knowing

  • DOH says the fluoroscopy rules "have not been updated in nearly 30 years" and that fluoroscopy causes some of the highest doses to operators and staff.
  • Current fluoroscopy rules require a 5-minute cumulative timer, recording of total fluoroscopy time per patient, and annual entrance exposure rate measurements (WAC 246-225-050).
  • Cardiovascular invasive specialists are a separate certified role whose procedural tasks must be done under personal supervision (WAC 246-926-400).
  • Washington retains the 150 mSv lens limit and has not adopted International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)'s 20 mSv.

What ORSIF could not confirm

Questions the research could not settle. If you know the answer, tell us.

  • Whether DOH treats WAC 246-221-005 as binding on X-ray registrants despite the "specific licensee" wording (contact: Matthew Bullock, Radiation Health Physicist).
  • Whether chapter 246-224 WAC contains ALARA or radiation-protection-program duties for registrants.
  • Scope and status of the Federally Required Chapter Updates (246-221 and others), including any link to NRC compatibility changes (https://doh.wa.gov/node/18161).
  • Whether a CR-102 has been filed for the 246-225 rewrite, and how the draft defines fluoroscope Classes 1-4.
  • Full text of RCW 18.84.020, HB 2113's final text, and WAC 246-926-510 (not read in full).
  • Profession-specific rules on whether physician assistants, nurse practitioners or nurses may operate fluoroscopy (not reviewed).
  • Whether Appendix I ("Good practices") or Appendix II (competency) of chapter 246-225 mentions apron care (not verified).
  • Whether DOH has approved an effective dose method such as National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) Report 122.

Double-check before you rely on this page

ORSIF compiled this page from the sources linked on it and did its best. It is not comprehensive and it is not always accurate. Rules change, a rule may have been missed or misread, and the sources themselves can be out of date. Treat this page as a starting point.

Where to check

What may be missing here

  • 2 of 14 answers on this page are "Not found" or "Unclear". That means ORSIF did not find the answer in the rules it reviewed, not that no rule exists.
  • 5 answers carry a flag or a lower confidence ("Check the source" or "Less certain").
  • Researched November 3, 2026. Rules may have changed since.
  • Only the state's rules for X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment were reviewed.

Found something wrong or missing? Tell ORSIF.

Sources and terms

Terms used on this page
ALARA
As low as reasonably achievable: keep radiation doses as low as is reasonable, below the legal limits.
Agreement State
A state that has signed an agreement with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to regulate certain radioactive materials itself.
mSv
Millisievert, a unit of radiation dose. Ten mSv equal one rem, the older unit some rules still use.
Dosimeter
A badge or device worn to measure a worker's radiation dose.
Lead equivalent
The thickness of lead (mm Pb) that would give the same protection as the material described.
NRC
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
ICRP
International Commission on Radiological Protection
NCRP
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements
TEDE
Total effective dose equivalent
ARRT
American Registry of Radiologic Technologists
All 14 sources the research read

Found something out of date or wrong? Tell ORSIF. Corrections are checked against the rule text and the page is updated.