The Evidence
Resources
Clinician AssessmentGet Your Risk Score FAQs Admin ToolkitMembers Economic Impact Research ArticlesMembers SIRP 2025 WebinarMembers Videos
Guidelines
What is ALARA+? US Guidelines International Guidelines News Is Not Here About Contact Donate
Join Free

Please double-check this information. This is an ORSIF research summary, researched November 3, 2026. It is not comprehensive and not always accurate: rules change, and answers may be incomplete, out of date or wrong. It is education, not legal advice. Not yet reviewed by a regulatory expert. Confirm each requirement at the source linked beside the answer, with the state program and with your facility's radiation safety officer. How this was made

In brief

ORSIF's research identified the Oregon Health Authority (OHA), Public Health Division, Center for Health Protection, Radiation Protection Services (RPS), X-ray program as the agency that regulates X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment in Oregon. Oregon is a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Agreement State: it has signed an agreement with the NRC to regulate certain radioactive materials itself.

Oregon's X-ray and radioactive-materials rules share division OAR 333-120, where the ALARA requirement applies to each licensee or registrant. The X-ray rules (OAR 333-106) add a separate "minimize" duty. Dose limits are the federal ones, including 150 mSv per year for the lens of the eye. Staff need aprons or whole-body protective barriers of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent, and aprons must be inspected annually. Engineered radiation protection systems are not mentioned by name. Fluoroscopy may be operated by radiologists, trained non-radiologist physicians, OBMI-licensed technologists, permitted physician associates and radiology assistants. PH 28-2026 (effective July 2026) tightened training for non-radiologist physicians.

The rules, question by question

Every answer names the rule it comes from. Open "Rule text and source" to read the citation, the source page and, where it could be matched, the exact wording.

Where the rules live

Which rules apply, and whether ALARA is among them.

Is Oregon an NRC Agreement State?

Yes

Yes. This is per the NRC list, and Oregon's rule text confirms it.

Rule text and source
Rule
NRC list of Agreement States, updated October 29, 2026; OAR 333-120-0000(1)
Source
nrc.gov
secure.sos.state.or.us
What it says
These rules are issued under ORS 453.605 to 453.807, and the State of Oregon's agreement with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Which rules cover X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment in Oregon?

Yes

X-ray and fluoroscopy rules are in OAR chapter 333, division 106, "X-Rays in the Healing Arts" (fluoroscopy at 333-106-0201 to -0245). General standards for both licensees and registrants are in OAR 333-120, "Standards for Protection Against Radiation." Division 106 applies in addition to other divisions. Registration rules are in divisions 100 and 101, which were not reviewed. The fetched division pages were cut off: division 106 at about 0360 and division 120 at about 0630.

Rule text and source
Rule
OAR 333-106-0001; OAR 333-120-0000(1)
Source
secure.sos.state.or.us
secure.sos.state.or.us
What it says
This division establishes standards for protection against ionizing radiation resulting from activities conducted under licenses and registrations issued by the Authority.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Does Oregon require X-ray users to keep doses as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)?

Yes

Yes. Each licensee or registrant must use procedures and engineering controls to keep occupational doses ALARA, and must review the radiation protection program at least once a year. The X-ray rules add a separate duty to minimize patient and personnel exposure (333-106-0045(1)). ALARA is also a required topic in operator safety training.

Where ALARA lives in Oregon: Only in a rule shared with radioactive materials. The ALARA requirement sits in shared division 120 (333-120-0020), which applies to licensees and registrants alike. Division 106 has no ALARA requirement of its own, only a separate "minimize" duty and ALARA as a training topic. A rewrite of 333-120-0020 would likely change the explicit ALARA duty for X-ray registrants; the research calls this an observation, not a legal conclusion. (OAR 333-120-0020(2); 333-120-0015(8); 333-106-0045(1); 333-106-0050)

Rule text and source
Rule
OAR 333-120-0020(2); OAR 333-106-0045(1)
Source
secure.sos.state.or.us
What it says
Each licensee or registrant must use, to the extent practicable, procedures and engineering controls based upon sound radiation protection principles to achieve occupational doses and doses to members of the public that are as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA).
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Dose limits

The annual limits for workers, written in millisieverts (mSv). Ten mSv equal one rem.

What is the annual whole-body dose limit in Oregon?

Yes

50 mSv (5 rem) total effective dose equivalent per year. Any organ or tissue except the lens: 500 mSv. Minors: 10% of the adult limits.

Rule text and source
Rule
OAR 333-120-0100(1); 333-120-0160
Source
secure.sos.state.or.us

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What is the annual eye-lens dose limit in Oregon?

Yes

150 mSv (15 rem) per year. Oregon has not adopted a lower limit such as the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)'s 20 mSv.

Rule text and source
Rule
OAR 333-120-0100(1)
Source
secure.sos.state.or.us
What it says
(A) A lens dose equivalent of 0.15 Sv (15 rem); and (B) A shallow-dose equivalent of 0.50 Sv (50 rem) to the skin of the whole body or to the skin of any extremity.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What is the annual limit for the skin, hands and feet in Oregon?

Yes

Shallow dose of 500 mSv (50 rem) per year to the skin or any extremity.

Rule text and source
Rule
OAR 333-120-0100(1)
Source
secure.sos.state.or.us
What it says
(A) A lens dose equivalent of 0.15 Sv (15 rem); and (B) A shallow-dose equivalent of 0.50 Sv (50 rem) to the skin of the whole body or to the skin of any extremity.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Dosimeters

When a worker must wear a dosimeter, and where.

When must a worker in Oregon wear a dosimeter?

Yes

A dosimeter must be worn by: adults likely to exceed 10% of an adult limit in a year; minors likely to exceed 10% of a minor's limit; declared pregnant women likely to exceed 1 mSv (0.1 rem) over the pregnancy; and anyone entering a high or very high radiation area. This applies to X-ray users through 333-106-0050.

Rule text and source
Rule
OAR 333-120-0210(1)
Source
secure.sos.state.or.us
What it says
(a) Adults likely to receive, in one year from sources external to the body, a dose in excess of 10 percent of the limits in OAR 333-120-0100(1);
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Where must the dosimeter be worn in Oregon when a protective apron is worn?

Yes

When an apron is worn, at least one badge goes at the collar outside the apron. A lens badge goes at the neck or closer to the eye, outside the apron. A second badge goes under the apron at the waist, and is required for a declared pregnant woman. Effective dose for fluoroscopy: (A) one neck badge, the deep dose counts as the effective dose; (B) one neck badge above 25% of the limit, deep dose × 0.3; (C) two badges, 1.5 × waist badge + 0.04 × neck badge. Other methods may be used if approved by the Authority. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) 122 and Webster are not named. The older 333-106-0050(1)(b) "most critical organ" language may be inconsistent with this.

Rule text and source
Rule
OAR 333-106-0050(1); 333-120-0100(3)(b); 333-120-0210(2)-(3)
Source
secure.sos.state.or.us
secure.sos.state.or.us
What it says
the sum of the deep dose equivalent reported for the individual monitoring device located at the waist under the protective apron multiplied by 1.5 and the deep dose equivalent reported for the individual monitoring device located at the neck outside the protective apron multiplied by 0.04.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Aprons and alternatives

Protective apparel, how it is checked, and whether other systems are addressed.

Must staff in Oregon fluoroscopy rooms wear protective aprons or other apparel?

Yes

Staff must be protected from scatter by aprons or whole-body protective barriers of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent. Any body part in the useful beam needs 0.5 mm lead equivalent. In fluoroscopy rooms, under-table scatter must be blocked by at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent. For above-table scatter, staff must be at least 120 cm from the beam center, or the scatter must pass through an additional 0.25 mm lead equivalent beyond the apron; exceptions may be granted on application. Thyroid shields and eyewear are not required for staff and appear only as training topics.

Rule text and source
Rule
OAR 333-106-0025(3); 333-106-0240
Source
secure.sos.state.or.us
What it says
Staff and ancillary personnel shall be protected from the direct scatter radiation by protective aprons or whole body protective barriers of not less than 0.25 mm lead equivalent.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Does Oregon require protective aprons to be inspected?

Yes

Yes. Aprons, gloves and shields must be checked annually for defects, with records kept. Defective items must be replaced or removed from service. Fluoroscopy may be used to check an item only if a visual and manual check suggests a problem.

Rule text and source
Rule
OAR 333-106-0045(12)
Source
secure.sos.state.or.us
What it says
Protective equipment including aprons, gloves and shields shall be checked annually for defects, such as holes, cracks and tears to assure reliability and integrity.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Do the rules in Oregon address engineered protection systems used in place of aprons?

UnclearLess certain

Not addressed explicitly. The general rule accepts "protective aprons or whole body protective barriers." The fluoroscopy rule treats drapes, panels and curtains as shielding in addition to the apron and allows exceptions on application. Whether an engineered whole-body system satisfies these rules is not stated.

Rule text and source
Rule
OAR 333-106-0025(3); 333-106-0240(2)
Source
secure.sos.state.or.us
What it says
in addition to any lead equivalency provided by the protective apron referred to in OAR 333-106-0025;
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

About ALARA+

Who operates the equipment

Who may use fluoroscopy equipment and what training the rules ask for.

Who may operate fluoroscopy equipment in Oregon?

Yes

Radiologists, with no supervision. Trained non-radiologist practitioners (MD, DO, DC, DPM, DVM), without supervision if the registrant arranges radiologist or physicist involvement. OBMI-licensed radiologic technologists, under radiologist personal or direct supervision, trained non-radiologist personal supervision, or personal supervision by an APRN with an OBMI Limited Fluoroscopy Supervision Permit. Physician associates with an OBMI permit and a collaborative agreement, with no supervision. Radiology assistants, under direct radiologist supervision. Students, under personal supervision. Trained veterinary operators. APRNs and nurses are not listed as operators.

Rule text and source
Rule
OAR 333-106-0205(3)-(4); 333-106-0005(41), (109)
Source
secure.sos.state.or.us
What it says
An advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) who has obtained an OBMI Limited Fluoroscopy Supervision Permit may provide personal supervision to radiologic technologists who have a permanent or temporary license issued from the OBMI to operate fluoroscopic equipment.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What training or credentials does Oregon require to operate fluoroscopy equipment?

In partLess certain

All operators need training on a set curriculum, including dose reduction, protective devices, dosimeter placement and dose limits. OBMI-licensed radiographers, permitted physician associates, radiology assistants and radiologists are deemed to meet it. Non-radiologist practitioners need OHA-approved training unless they were operating before April 11, 2005; since PH 28-2026 this also applies when they supervise an operator in the room. No fluoroscopy training hours or continuing education were found in the RPS rules. OBMI rules were not reviewed.

Rule text and source
Rule
OAR 333-106-0205(2)-(4); 333-106-0005(89)-(90)
Source
secure.sos.state.or.us
What it says
(b) Non-radiologist practitioners who have successfully completed a training program from an Oregon Health Authority (Authority) approved resource that meets section (2) of this rule, or have been operating fluoroscopic equipment prior to April 11, 2005;
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Changes on the way, and recent ones

Rules, bills and guidance the research found from 2025 and 2026, with the ones that touch fluoroscopy teams first.

  • Adopted rulePermanent Administrative Order PH 28-2026

    Filed and effective 07/02/2026 (notice filed 04/29/2026; comment closed May 21, 2026) (Jul 2, 2026)

    Amended 333-106-0005 so supervision includes the duty to direct the work. Amended 333-106-0205 to require OHA-approved training for non-radiologist practitioners who operate fluoroscopy or supervise an operator in the room. Added rules for veterinary operators.

    Source: oregon.gov

1 other item the research logged (radiation therapy, industrial machines, fees and other subjects)
  • OtherRPS preliminary legislative concept on 2025-2031 funding (Radiation Advisory Committee slides, Feb 11, 2026)

    Lead only; seen as a search excerpt and not read (Feb 11, 2026)

    The slides mention a preliminary legislative concept on 2025-2031 funding.

    Source: oregon.gov

Also worth knowing

  • Facilities must record cumulative fluoroscopy time for each exam, set time benchmarks, and run quality-assurance studies of each fluoroscopist at least every 12 months (333-106-0205(10)).
  • The Radiation Safety Committee must take corrective action on fluoroscopists who exceed benchmarks more than 10% of the time.
  • Typical entrance exposure rates must be posted in fluoroscopy rooms, and written procedures must list who is authorized to operate (333-106-0205(8)-(9)).
  • Occupationally exposed personnel may not hold patients during radiographic exams (333-106-0040(3)).
  • Deliberately exposing a dosimeter to give a false reading is prohibited (333-106-0050(2)).
  • RPS provides an "Instruction Concerning Prenatal Radiation Exposure" document (333-120-0170 note).
  • In the 2026 rulemaking, OHA declined to state that supervised ministerial assistance by support staff is not operation, saying patient positioning falls under OBMI's statute.

What ORSIF could not confirm

Questions the research could not settle. If you know the answer, tell us.

  • The fetched rule text was cut off (division 106 at about 0360, division 120 at about 0630). The "not addressed" finding on engineered systems should be confirmed against the full divisions.
  • OBMI permits (OAR chapter 337, ORS 688.405-688.915) were not reviewed: physician associate and APRN permit requirements, training hours or continuing education, and rules on unlicensed staff positioning patients.
  • OHA's guidance on fluoroscopy training for non-radiologist physicians was found but not read: https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/HEALTHYENVIRONMENTS/RADIATIONPROTECTION/Documents/fluoro-training-non-rad-physicians.pdf
  • 2025-2026 Oregon bills were not searched (OLIS: https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov), including for apron or shielding bills and the RPS funding concept.
  • No OHA/RPS statement was found on how it would respond to the NRC ALARA proposal. Ask RPS (971-673-0490) or check Radiation Advisory Committee minutes.
  • It is unclear whether OHA has approved any other effective-dose method under 333-120-0100(3), and how it reconciles that rule with the "critical organ" language in 333-106-0050(1)(b).
  • It is unclear whether any facility holds an exception under 333-106-0240(2)(c), or approval to use whole-body barriers in place of aprons.

Double-check before you rely on this page

ORSIF compiled this page from the sources linked on it and did its best. It is not comprehensive and it is not always accurate. Rules change, a rule may have been missed or misread, and the sources themselves can be out of date. Treat this page as a starting point.

Where to check

What may be missing here

  • 1 of 14 answers on this page are "Not found" or "Unclear". That means ORSIF did not find the answer in the rules it reviewed, not that no rule exists.
  • 2 answers carry a flag or a lower confidence ("Check the source" or "Less certain").
  • Researched November 3, 2026. Rules may have changed since.
  • Only the state's rules for X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment were reviewed.

Found something wrong or missing? Tell ORSIF.

Sources and terms

Terms used on this page
ALARA
As low as reasonably achievable: keep radiation doses as low as is reasonable, below the legal limits.
Agreement State
A state that has signed an agreement with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to regulate certain radioactive materials itself.
mSv
Millisievert, a unit of radiation dose. Ten mSv equal one rem, the older unit some rules still use.
Dosimeter
A badge or device worn to measure a worker's radiation dose.
Lead equivalent
The thickness of lead (mm Pb) that would give the same protection as the material described.
NRC
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
ICRP
International Commission on Radiological Protection
NCRP
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements
All 10 sources the research read

Found something out of date or wrong? Tell ORSIF. Corrections are checked against the rule text and the page is updated.