The Evidence
Resources
Clinician AssessmentGet Your Risk Score FAQs Admin ToolkitMembers Economic Impact Research ArticlesMembers SIRP 2025 WebinarMembers Videos
Guidelines
What is ALARA+? US Guidelines International Guidelines News Is Not Here About Contact Donate
Join Free

Please double-check this information. This is an ORSIF research summary, researched November 3, 2026. It is not comprehensive and not always accurate: rules change, and answers may be incomplete, out of date or wrong. It is education, not legal advice. Not yet reviewed by a regulatory expert. Confirm each requirement at the source linked beside the answer, with the state program and with your facility's radiation safety officer. How this was made

In brief

ORSIF's research identified the Radiation Control Program (X-Ray Program), Division of Waste Management, North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality (NDDEQ) as the agency that regulates X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment in North Dakota. North Dakota is a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Agreement State: it has signed an agreement with the NRC to regulate certain radioactive materials itself.

North Dakota requires ALARA for X-ray and fluoroscopy registrants by adopting 10 CFR Part 20 as of May 9, 2022, in a chapter shared with radioactive-materials licensees, so NRC changes are not automatic. Dose limits are federal: 50 mSv whole body, 150 mSv lens, 500 mSv skin and extremities, and 5 mSv to the embryo/fetus. Staff must be protected from scatter by "protective aprons or whole body protective barriers" of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent. No apron inspection requirement was found, and engineered protection systems are not named. Fluoroscopy may be performed only by licensed practitioners or persons licensed by the Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy Board; physician assistants' scope excludes medical imaging.

The rules, question by question

Every answer names the rule it comes from. Open "Rule text and source" to read the citation, the source page and, where it could be matched, the exact wording.

Where the rules live

Which rules apply, and whether ALARA is among them.

Is North Dakota an NRC Agreement State?

Yes

Yes. North Dakota is not on the NRC list of non-Agreement States. State rules substitute the state department for "NRC".

Rule text and source
Rule
NRC list of Agreement States, updated October 29, 2026; NDAC 33.1-10-04.2-01(3)
Source
nrc.gov
ndlegis.gov
What it says
Where the words "NRC", "commission", ... appear in 10 CFR part 20, substitute the words "department of environmental quality".
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Which rules cover X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment in North Dakota?

YesCheck the source

NDAC ch. 33.1-10-06, "X-Rays in the Healing Arts" (fluoroscopy at 33.1-10-06-05; effective January 1, 2019, with no later amendments), plus NDAC ch. 33.1-10-04.2, "Standards for Protection Against Radiation." Chapter 33.1-10-04.2 adopts 10 CFR Part 20 "as they exist on May 9, 2022" (amended effective January 1, 2023) and adds fluoroscopy-specific sections 04.2-02 to 04.2-04.

Rule text and source
Rule
NDAC 33.1-10-06-01; 33.1-10-04.2-01
Source
ndlegis.gov
ndlegis.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Does North Dakota require X-ray users to keep doses as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)?

YesCheck the source

Yes. 10 CFR 20.1101(b) is adopted by reference, and the chapter applies to registrants as well as licensees.

Where ALARA lives in North Dakota: In a shared rule and in X-ray-specific language. The binding ALARA duty is in the shared chapter 33.1-10-04.2 (covering both radioactive-materials licensees and X-ray registrants) through adoption of 10 CFR 20.1101 as of May 9, 2022, so an NRC change would not alter North Dakota's text automatically and NDDEQ would have to amend 33.1-10-04.2-01. Chapter 33.1-10-06 defines ALARA but has no operative sentence using the term. It separately requires exposure-minimizing procedures for personnel, which would remain even if Part 20 changed. (NDAC 33.1-10-04.2-01; 33.1-10-06-02(9); 33.1-10-06-03(1)(a)(10))

Rule text and source
Rule
NDAC 33.1-10-04.2-01 (intro and subsection 2), adopting 10 CFR 20.1101(b)
Source
ndlegis.gov
deq.nd.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Dose limits

The annual limits for workers, written in millisieverts (mSv). Ten mSv equal one rem.

What is the annual whole-body dose limit in North Dakota?

Yes

TEDE of 5 rem (50 mSv) per year, or 50 rem (500 mSv) to any organ other than the lens, whichever is more limiting (federal limits adopted by reference).

Rule text and source
Rule
NDAC 33.1-10-04.2-01 adopting 10 CFR 20.1201; 33.1-10-06-03(1)(a)(11)
Source
deq.nd.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What is the annual eye-lens dose limit in North Dakota?

Yes

15 rem (150 mSv) per year. No lower limit (such as International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)'s 20 mSv) has been adopted.

Rule text and source
Rule
NDAC 33.1-10-04.2-01 adopting 10 CFR 20.1201
Source
deq.nd.gov
What it says
(i) A lens dose equivalent of 15 rems (0.15 Sv), and (ii) A shallow-dose equivalent of 50 rem (0.5 Sv) to the skin of the whole body or to the skin of any extremity.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What is the annual limit for the skin, hands and feet in North Dakota?

Yes

Shallow-dose equivalent of 50 rem (500 mSv) to the skin or any extremity.

Rule text and source
Rule
NDAC 33.1-10-04.2-01 adopting 10 CFR 20.1201
Source
deq.nd.gov
What it says
(i) A lens dose equivalent of 15 rems (0.15 Sv), and (ii) A shallow-dose equivalent of 50 rem (0.5 Sv) to the skin of the whole body or to the skin of any extremity.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What limit applies to a declared pregnant worker in North Dakota?

Yes

0.5 rem (5 mSv) to the embryo/fetus of a declared pregnant woman over the whole pregnancy.

Rule text and source
Rule
NDAC 33.1-10-04.2-01 adopting 10 CFR 20.1208
Source
deq.nd.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Dosimeters

When a worker must wear a dosimeter, and where.

When must a worker in North Dakota wear a dosimeter?

YesLess certain

Under adopted 10 CFR 20.1502, a dosimeter is required for adults likely to exceed 10% of the limits, for declared pregnant women likely to exceed 1 mSv, and for minors above set levels. Separately, 33.1-10-04.2-02 requires dose monitoring for people working with medical fluoroscopy and states no threshold; NDDEQ's reading of that section is unconfirmed.

Rule text and source
Rule
NDAC 33.1-10-04.2-02; 10 CFR 20.1502(a) as adopted
Source
ndlegis.gov
What it says
Each registrant shall provide dose monitoring and shall monitor occupational exposure to ensure compliance for: 1. Occupational dose limits to adults pursuant to 10 CFR 20.1201.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Where must the dosimeter be worn in North Dakota when a protective apron is worn?

YesCheck the source

With an apron, the whole-body badge is worn at the collar outside the apron and the fetal badge at the waist under the apron. Approved effective-dose methods are: a single collar badge (multiplied by 0.3 if the reading exceeds 25% of the limit), or two badges (1.5 × waist + 0.04 × collar). The 0.3 and two-badge methods require leaded glasses, a thyroid shield, a wraparound apron, scatter barriers, minimized beam-on time, formal training, a quality assurance (QA) program and dose monitoring. The rule does not name National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) 122 or Webster, though the two-badge coefficients match the Webster (1989) equation.

Rule text and source
Rule
NDAC 33.1-10-04.2-03, -04; 33.1-10-06-03(1)(a)(11)(a)
Source
ndlegis.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Aprons and alternatives

Protective apparel, how it is checked, and whether other systems are addressed.

Must staff in North Dakota fluoroscopy rooms wear protective aprons or other apparel?

YesCheck the source

Operators and required staff must be protected from scatter by aprons or whole-body barriers of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent (0.5 mm if the body could be struck by the useful beam). Facilities must keep enough leaded aprons and gloves for personnel not otherwise shielded. Fluoroscopy rooms need drapes or curtains of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent in addition to the apron, unless the person is at least 120 cm from the beam center. Thyroid shields and eyewear are not generally required.

Rule text and source
Rule
NDAC 33.1-10-06-03(1)(a)(6)(a)-(b), (9)(g); 33.1-10-06-05(9); 33.1-10-04.2-04(4)(b)
Source
ndlegis.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Do the rules in North Dakota address engineered protection systems used in place of aprons?

In partLess certain

Engineered systems are not addressed by name. The scatter-protection rule allows "protective aprons or whole body protective barriers," and protective barrier is defined broadly. Drapes and curtains count as scatter barriers in fluoroscopy, and sterile-field exceptions are available. No rule, bill or guidance like Arizona SB 1121 or Illinois' 32 Ill. Adm. Code 360 was found, and there is no NDDEQ interpretation.

Rule text and source
Rule
NDAC 33.1-10-06-03(1)(a)(6)(b); 33.1-10-06-02(98); 33.1-10-06-05(9)(b)-(c)
Source
ndlegis.gov
What it says
The department may grant exceptions to subdivision b of this subsection in some special procedures where a sterile field will not permit the use of the normal protective barriers.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

About ALARA+

Who operates the equipment

Who may use fluoroscopy equipment and what training the rules ask for.

Who may operate fluoroscopy equipment in North Dakota?

YesCheck the source

Performing fluoroscopy requires a license under NDCC ch. 43-62 unless the person is a licensed practitioner (physician, APRN, chiropractor, dentist or podiatrist). Radiographers work under general supervision and radiologist assistants under a radiologist. RCIS/RCES may assist only under personal supervision. Legacy fluoroscopy technologists are limited to GI fluoroscopy, and limited operators may not perform fluoroscopy. Physician assistants' scope excludes medical imaging. "Panning" and activating fluoroscopy count as performing imaging.

Rule text and source
Rule
NDCC 43-62-01(3), (5), 43-62-02, 43-62-03(1), 43-62-14.1; NDAC 114-02-01-01(4)-(5), 114-02-01-05, -06 (eff. April 1, 2018); NDCC 43-17-02.1; NDAC 33.1-10-06 App. I
Source
ndlegis.gov
ndlegis.gov
ndlegis.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What training or credentials does North Dakota require to operate fluoroscopy equipment?

Yes

All operators except physicians (MD/DO), chiropractors and podiatrists must be instructed in the Appendix F safety topics; general diagnostic operators need American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) eligibility or certification, or department approval, plus 24 CEUs per two years (12 for limited operators). Radiographers need ARRT or the state exam. RCIS/RCES need the CCI registry plus 12 hours of fluoroscopy safety education every two years; fluoroscopy technologists need 6 hours per renewal. APRN guidance (not binding) calls for 40 classroom hours, 40 logged cases and a national exam. No state fluoroscopy training requirement was found for physicians.

Rule text and source
Rule
NDAC 33.1-10-06-03(1)(a)(2)-(3), Apps. F, G, K; NDAC 114-02-01-05, -06; NDCC 43-62-14.1(6); Board of Nursing/Imaging Board joint statement (December 2024)
Source
ndlegis.gov
ndbon.org
What it says
Biennially shall complete twelve hours of fluoroscopy safety and relevant radiation protection continuing education.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Changes on the way, and recent ones

Rules, bills and guidance the research found from 2025 and 2026, with the ones that touch fluoroscopy teams first.

  • OtherPending NRC Part 20 rule

    NRC final rule expected late November 2026; no North Dakota rulemaking found

    Because North Dakota adopted Part 20 as of a fixed date (May 9, 2022), the NRC change would require the state to amend 33.1-10-04.2-01 itself. No proposed or recently adopted 2025-2026 change to the X-ray, standards or operator rules was found.

Also worth knowing

  • North Dakota has its own fluoroscopy rules for monitoring, badge placement and dose calculation (33.1-10-04.2-02 to -04). They apply to X-ray registrants and tie the reduced-dose calculations to wearing leaded glasses, a thyroid shield and a wraparound apron.
  • The X-ray chapter dates from the film era. Section 06-05(9)(b) cites "paragraph 5" of 06-03(1)(a) for the apron rule, which is actually in paragraph 6, an apparently stale cross-reference.
  • NDDEQ says inspection frequency "ranges from yearly (mammography facilities) to once every seven years (veterinarian)"; no frequency was given for fluoroscopy.
  • Plans for new or modified X-ray rooms, including shielding, must be approved in advance (33.1-10-06-03(2)).

What ORSIF could not confirm

Questions the research could not settle. If you know the answer, tell us.

  • Does NDDEQ read 33.1-10-04.2-02 to require dosimeters for everyone working with medical fluoroscopy, regardless of the 10% threshold?
  • Does NDDEQ accept a whole-body protective barrier, such as a suspended or engineered shielding system, in fluoroscopy, and does 06-03(1)(a)(6)(b) apply to fluoroscopy at all given the stale "paragraph 5" cross-reference?
  • Is apron inspection addressed in 33.1-10-10.1 or in NDDEQ inspection checklists or guidance?
  • How are "personal supervision" and "general supervision" defined in NDAC 114-01-02, and what does Imaging Board guidance say about scrub techs and nurses who pan the table?
  • Can a physician assistant who also holds a 43-62 license perform fluoroscopy, and is there any physician fluoroscopy training requirement through the Board of Medicine or hospital credentialing?
  • Will NDDEQ amend 33.1-10-04.2-01 after the NRC final rule, and will the 2027 Legislative Assembly consider imaging or apron-alternative bills?
  • What does the agency-wide NDDEQ public-notice page (https://deq.nd.gov/PublicNotice.aspx) show? It did not load when the research read it.

Double-check before you rely on this page

ORSIF compiled this page from the sources linked on it and did its best. It is not comprehensive and it is not always accurate. Rules change, a rule may have been missed or misread, and the sources themselves can be out of date. Treat this page as a starting point.

Where to check

What may be missing here

  • 1 of 14 answers on this page are "Not found" or "Unclear". That means ORSIF did not find the answer in the rules it reviewed, not that no rule exists.
  • 8 answers carry a flag or a lower confidence ("Check the source" or "Less certain").
  • Researched November 3, 2026. Rules may have changed since.
  • Only the state's rules for X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment were reviewed.

Found something wrong or missing? Tell ORSIF.

Sources and terms

Terms used on this page
ALARA
As low as reasonably achievable: keep radiation doses as low as is reasonable, below the legal limits.
Agreement State
A state that has signed an agreement with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to regulate certain radioactive materials itself.
mSv
Millisievert, a unit of radiation dose. Ten mSv equal one rem, the older unit some rules still use.
Dosimeter
A badge or device worn to measure a worker's radiation dose.
Lead equivalent
The thickness of lead (mm Pb) that would give the same protection as the material described.
NRC
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
ICRP
International Commission on Radiological Protection
NCRP
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements
TEDE
Total effective dose equivalent
ARRT
American Registry of Radiologic Technologists
QA
Quality assurance
All 17 sources the research read

Found something out of date or wrong? Tell ORSIF. Corrections are checked against the rule text and the page is updated.