The Evidence
Resources
Clinician AssessmentGet Your Risk Score FAQs Admin ToolkitMembers Economic Impact Research ArticlesMembers SIRP 2025 WebinarMembers Videos
Guidelines
What is ALARA+? US Guidelines International Guidelines News Is Not Here About Contact Donate
Join Free

Please double-check this information. This is an ORSIF research summary, researched November 3, 2026. It is not comprehensive and not always accurate: rules change, and answers may be incomplete, out of date or wrong. It is education, not legal advice. Not yet reviewed by a regulatory expert. Confirm each requirement at the source linked beside the answer, with the state program and with your facility's radiation safety officer. How this was made

In brief

ORSIF's research identified the NC Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Health Service Regulation, Radiation Protection Section as the agency that regulates X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment in North Carolina. North Carolina is a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Agreement State: it has signed an agreement with the NRC to regulate certain radioactive materials itself.

North Carolina requires X-ray and fluoroscopy facilities to keep worker doses ALARA by adopting 10 CFR 20.1101 into one state rule, 10A NCAC 15.1601, which covers both X-ray registrants and radioactive-materials licensees. That rule adopts the federal text "including subsequent amendments and editions," so a final NRC rule removing ALARA could carry over to X-ray users. Dose limits are the federal ones: 50 mSv per year whole body, 150 mSv lens of the eye (no lower International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)-style limit), 500 mSv skin and extremities, and 5 mSv for the fetus of a declared pregnant worker. Staff in the room must wear apparel of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent or use whole-body protective equipment of the same rating, and the rules say where to wear the badge when such equipment replaces an apron. Current rules require only facility training for fluoroscopy operators, no license or certification. A rule proposed for January 1, 2027 would limit fluoroscopy to physicians, NPs and PAs under general physician supervision, American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT)-registered technologists, and supervised students.

The rules, question by question

Every answer names the rule it comes from. Open "Rule text and source" to read the citation, the source page and, where it could be matched, the exact wording.

Where the rules live

Which rules apply, and whether ALARA is among them.

Is North Carolina an NRC Agreement State?

Yes

Yes. North Carolina is on the NRC's list of Agreement States, updated October 29, 2026.

Rule text and source
Rule
NRC list of Agreement States, updated October 29, 2026; 10A NCAC 15.0104 (amended effective October 1, 2026)
Source
nrc.gov
reports.oah.state.nc.us
What it says
Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended," signed July 21, 1964, hereinafter known as the "Agreement," is incorporated by reference
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Which rules cover X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment in North Carolina?

Yes

10A NCAC 15 Section.0600, "X-Rays in the Healing Arts" (.0601-.0607;.0611 covers CT), with machine registration in Section.0200..0601,.0602 and.0605-.0607 were readopted effective August 1, 2026;.0603 and.0604 still carry older text and are re-proposed. Standards for protection against radiation are in 10A NCAC 15.1601, which adopts most of 10 CFR Part 20 by reference for registrants and licensees alike. The old state rules.1602-.1649 were repealed effective October 1, 2023.

Rule text and source
Rule
10A NCAC 15.0601(e);.1601
Source
reports.oah.state.nc.us
What it says
The requirements of this Section are in addition to those in Sections .0100, .0200, .1000, .1100, and .1600 of this Chapter.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Does North Carolina require X-ray users to keep doses as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)?

Yes

Yes. Rule.1601 makes X-ray registrants follow 10 CFR 20.1101 (reading "licensee" as "registrant"); 20.1101(b) is the ALARA requirement. State guidance (Rev. 11/17/16) also tells registrants to describe their ALARA procedures, though it cites the old repealed rule numbers.

Where ALARA lives in North Carolina: In a shared rule and in X-ray-specific language. ALARA lives mainly in shared rule.1601, which covers both registrants and radioactive-materials licensees and adopts Part 20 "including subsequent amendments and editions," so on its face an NRC change to 20.1101 would apply to X-ray registrants unless NC amends.1601. Older X-ray rule.0603 also requires measures to "minimize patient and personnel exposure." The proposed replacement (.0604) does not appear to keep that sentence, and the readopted.0605 refers only to optimizing patient dose. (10A NCAC 15.1601(b);.0603(a)(1)(I) (current older text))

Rule text and source
Rule
10A NCAC 15.1601(b)(3)(D) and (b)(7); 10 CFR 20.1101(b)
Source
govinfo.gov
What it says
The licensee shall use, to the extent practical, procedures and engineering controls based upon sound radiation protection principles to achieve occupational doses and doses to members of the public that are as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA).
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Dose limits

The annual limits for workers, written in millisieverts (mSv). Ten mSv equal one rem.

What is the annual whole-body dose limit in North Carolina?

Yes

5 rem (50 mSv) TEDE per year, via 10 CFR 20.1201 adopted through.1601(b)(8).

Rule text and source
Rule
10 CFR 20.1201(a), via.1601
Source
ecfr.gov
What it says
The total effective dose equivalent being equal to 5 rems (0.05 Sv)
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What is the annual eye-lens dose limit in North Carolina?

Yes

15 rem (150 mSv) per year; NC has not adopted a lower lens limit.

Rule text and source
Rule
10 CFR 20.1201(a), via.1601
Source
ecfr.gov
What it says
A lens dose equivalent of 15 rems (0.15 Sv)
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What is the annual limit for the skin, hands and feet in North Carolina?

Yes

50 rem (500 mSv) per year for skin and extremities.

Rule text and source
Rule
10 CFR 20.1201(a), via.1601
Source
ecfr.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What limit applies to a declared pregnant worker in North Carolina?

Yes

0.5 rem (5 mSv) to the embryo/fetus of a declared pregnant worker over the whole pregnancy.

Rule text and source
Rule
10 CFR 20.1208(a), via.1601
Source
ecfr.gov
What it says
does not exceed 0.5 rem (5 mSv)
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Dosimeters

When a worker must wear a dosimeter, and where.

When must a worker in North Carolina wear a dosimeter?

YesCheck the source

Under 10 CFR 20.1502 (via.1601(b)(24)), a badge is required for adults likely to get more than 10% of a 20.1201(a) limit in a year, for declared pregnant workers likely to get more than 0.1 rem (1 mSv) over the pregnancy, and for minors under lower thresholds. Operators of handheld dental units must always use a badge (.0605(k)(2)).

Rule text and source
Rule
10 CFR 20.1502(a)
Source
ecfr.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Where must the dosimeter be worn in North Carolina when a protective apron is worn?

Yes

The badge is worn at the collar, outside the apparel, or on the torso if protective equipment replaces apparel. A fetal badge goes at the waist under any apparel. If more than one badge is worn, each dose must be labeled by where it was worn; state guidance (Rev. 3/24/15) describes a two-badge setup (collar outside plus waist under). No state-approved effective dose method (no National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) 122 or Webster) was found, so under 20.1201(c) deep-dose equivalent must be used unless the state agency approves a method.

Rule text and source
Rule
10A NCAC 15.0605(m) (readopted effective August 1, 2026)
Source
reports.oah.state.nc.us
What it says
(1) The individual monitoring device shall be worn at the collar, outside the apparel. (2) If protective equipment is used in place of protective apparel, the individual radiation monitoring device shall be worn on the torso.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Aprons and alternatives

Protective apparel, how it is checked, and whether other systems are addressed.

Must staff in North Carolina fluoroscopy rooms wear protective aprons or other apparel?

Yes

Yes. Everyone in the room except the patient must be protected from scatter by apparel or whole-body equipment of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent, and any body part that could be in the primary beam needs at least 0.5 mm lead equivalent. Thyroid shields and eyewear are not required; guidance only calls them "advisable." The guidance also says aprons "must" be 0.5 mm at 150 kVp, which conflicts with the 0.25 mm in the rule.

Rule text and source
Rule
10A NCAC 15.0605(h)(1);.0603(a)(1)(E)(ii)
Source
radiation.ncdhhs.gov
What it says
protected from scatter radiation by protective apparel or whole-body protective equipment of 0.25 mm lead equivalent or greater material.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Does North Carolina require protective aprons to be inspected?

Not foundLess certain

No inspection requirement found in the rules. Non-binding state guidance (Rev. 3/24/15) recommends checking aprons fluoroscopically at least once a year, "If possible."

Rule text and source
Source
radiation.ncdhhs.gov
What it says
Lead aprons should be checked fluoroscopically at least on an annual basis for their shielding integrity.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Do the rules in North Carolina address engineered protection systems used in place of aprons?

In part

Addressed in general terms. The rules accept "whole-body protective equipment" of 0.25 mm lead equivalent as an alternative to apparel and say where to wear the badge when equipment is used in place of apparel. "Protective equipment" is not defined (only "protective apparel" is, in.0602(33)), and there is no approval process or performance standard specific to engineered systems.

Rule text and source
Rule
10A NCAC 15.0605(h)(1)(B), (m)(2)
Source
reports.oah.state.nc.us
What it says
If protective equipment is used in place of protective apparel, the individual radiation monitoring device shall be worn on the torso.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

About ALARA+

Who operates the equipment

Who may use fluoroscopy equipment and what training the rules ask for.

Who may operate fluoroscopy equipment in North Carolina?

In partLess certain

Now: no credential is required; registrants must train operators (.0603(a)(1)(B)) and exposures must be authorized by a licensed practitioner (.0605(b)(1)). Proposed.0603 (effective January 1, 2027): fluoroscopy limited to physicians, NPs/PAs under the general supervision of a trained physician (the 2025 draft said personal supervision), ARRT-registered technologists (Radiography), and students under personal supervision. Angiography: physicians, ARRT technologists, CCI-credentialed RCIS/RCES staff, and supervised students. RNs are not listed.

Rule text and source
Rule
Proposed 10A NCAC 15.0603(i)(2)-(3)
Source
info.ncdhhs.gov
What it says
individuals who operate fluoroscopy radiation machines shall be a physician as defined in Rule .0103(b)(8) of this Chapter or an advanced practitioner provider (APP) as defined in Rule .0602(2) of this Section under the general supervision of a physician
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What training or credentials does North Carolina require to operate fluoroscopy equipment?

In partLess certain

Now: facility training only. Proposed: ARRT registration for technologists; non-radiologist physicians and NPs/PAs would need fluoroscopy training in four topics, with no hours specified. Training records must be kept, and operators would have 36 months after the effective date to comply. No state fluoroscopy permit or continuing-education requirement was found.

Rule text and source
Rule
Proposed.0603(c), (m), (n)
Source
info.ncdhhs.gov
What it says
For individuals other than radiologists and ARRT-registered technologists, instruction and training to operate fluoroscopic and angiographic radiation machines shall include: (1) radiation quantities and units; (2) biological effects of ionizing radiation
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Changes on the way, and recent ones

Rules, bills and guidance the research found from 2025 and 2026, with the ones that touch fluoroscopy teams first.

  • Adopted ruleReadoption of 10A NCAC 15.0601,.0602,.0605-.0607

    Readopted (Aug 1, 2026)

    Readopted X-ray rules;.0607 now adopts FDA equipment standards (21 CFR 1020.32 for fluoroscopy) including future amendments.

    Source: info.ncdhhs.gov

  • Proposed ruleProposed 10A NCAC 15.0603 (operator requirements) and.0604 (facility responsibilities); repeal of.0611

    Re-published August 17, 2026; hearing September 9, 2026; comments through October 16, 2026; status after October 2026 unverified (Jan 1, 2027)

    Would set operator qualifications and training for fluoroscopy and angiography. Proposed effective date January 1, 2027. The first 2025 round drew comments from the NC Board of Nursing, NC Nurses Association, NC Healthcare Association, Duke, UNC, WakeMed and Advocate Health, among others.

    Source: info.ncdhhs.gov

  • BillHB 590 / SB 415

    HB 590 passed the House 108-0 on June 25, 2025; referred to Senate Rules on June 26, 2025

    Would license imaging staff; exempts nurse practitioners, physician assistants and CRNAs performing fluoroscopy.

    Source: ncleg.gov

1 other item the research logged (radiation therapy, industrial machines, fees and other subjects)
  • Adopted ruleAmendments to 10A NCAC 15.1601

    Amended effective May 1, 2025 and October 1, 2026

    The April 1, 2026 NC Register notice says the purpose was moving NRC comments into the relevant rules.

    Source: files.nc.gov

Also worth knowing

  • Mismatched cross-references: the older.0603 still points to repealed rules.1604,.1614 and.1640, and the readopted.0605 cites ".1601(a)(8)" and "(a)(53)" where the dose list is actually in.1601(b).
  • Overlapping text: the older.0603 and the new.0605 both contain apron and badge rules.
  • Patient holding: no worker may be the one who always holds patients (.0605(f)).
  • Hand-held fluoroscopic screens are banned (.0110(3)).
  • The older.0603(a)(1)(E)(iv) requires extra protection where non-occupationally exposed staff could get one-fourth of the maximum permissible dose.
  • State apron guidance says aprons "must" be 0.5 mm at 150 kVp, which conflicts with the rule's 0.25 mm.

What ORSIF could not confirm

Questions the research could not settle. If you know the answer, tell us.

  • Status of proposed.0603/.0604: has the Commission adopted them, has the Rules Review Commission approved them, or did 10+ objections send them to legislative review? Check the DHSR page and the RRC agendas.
  • Which version is current: one 2026-linked PDF carries an 8/11/2025 date header. Confirm against the NC Register for August 17, 2026 (Vol. 41, Issue 04).
  • Effect of an NRC change: does NC read "subsequent amendments" in.1601 as automatically picking up a final NRC change to 20.1101, and does the Radiation Protection Section plan its own ALARA language for X-ray users? Ask the Section at (919) 814-2250.
  • Effective dose methods: does the agency approve any method for calculating effective dose under aprons (for example Webster or NCRP 122)? Ask the Radiology Compliance Branch.
  • Mismatched cross-references: these may be fixed in the January 2027 package. Check the final text.
  • Apron inspection: no rule requirement was found. Check inspection checklists or license and registration conditions.

Double-check before you rely on this page

ORSIF compiled this page from the sources linked on it and did its best. It is not comprehensive and it is not always accurate. Rules change, a rule may have been missed or misread, and the sources themselves can be out of date. Treat this page as a starting point.

Where to check

What may be missing here

  • 1 of 14 answers on this page are "Not found" or "Unclear". That means ORSIF did not find the answer in the rules it reviewed, not that no rule exists.
  • 4 answers carry a flag or a lower confidence ("Check the source" or "Less certain").
  • Researched November 3, 2026. Rules may have changed since.
  • Only the state's rules for X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment were reviewed.

Found something wrong or missing? Tell ORSIF.

Sources and terms

Terms used on this page
ALARA
As low as reasonably achievable: keep radiation doses as low as is reasonable, below the legal limits.
Agreement State
A state that has signed an agreement with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to regulate certain radioactive materials itself.
mSv
Millisievert, a unit of radiation dose. Ten mSv equal one rem, the older unit some rules still use.
Dosimeter
A badge or device worn to measure a worker's radiation dose.
Lead equivalent
The thickness of lead (mm Pb) that would give the same protection as the material described.
NRC
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
ICRP
International Commission on Radiological Protection
NCRP
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements
TEDE
Total effective dose equivalent
ARRT
American Registry of Radiologic Technologists
All 16 sources the research read

Found something out of date or wrong? Tell ORSIF. Corrections are checked against the rule text and the page is updated.