Research summary, original research, 2014

Using 7.5 frames per second reduces radiation exposure in lower extremity peripheral vascular interventions

Akkus NI, Mina GS, Abdulbaki A, Shafiei F, Tandon N. Vascular. 2014

Read the original paper

In plain language

In 87 lower-limb peripheral vascular interventions, using 7.5 instead of 15 frames per second was associated with about 60% lower patient dose area product, with similar fluoroscopy time and success. Staff dose was not measured, though it likely falls in parallel.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Retrospective cohort study
Who was studied
Patients
Size
n = 87 procedures
Summary based on
the abstract

What it found

  • Median dose area product was significantly lower with 7.5 fps than with 15 fps.

    Key figures: 3358 (IQR 2052-7394) vs 8812 (IQR 4944-17,370), p < 0.001

  • Fluoroscopy time did not differ significantly between frame rates.

    Key figures: 18.7 min (IQR 11.1-31.5) vs 15.7 min (IQR 10.1-24.1), p = 0.156

  • Procedural success rates were comparable.

    Key figures: 93.2% vs 95.3%, p > 0.999

Limits to keep in mind

Small retrospective two-center comparison of 87 procedures without randomization; only patient dose area product was measured, not operator or staff dose.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.