Research summary, original research, 2026

Fluoroscopy-minimization strategy for catheter ablation of Supraventricular Tachycardia by wOmen OPerators: the STOOP Multicentre Registry

Poggi S, Giaccardi M, Cipolletta L, Jordan A, Teres C, Serdoz LV, et al.. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2026

Read the original paper

In plain language

In 710 supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) ablations by 32 women electrophysiologists in 12 European centres, a near-zero fluoroscopy approach kept estimated annual operator dose far below the 1 mSv pregnancy limit. Doses were estimated from patient dose-area product (DAP), not measured, and covered SVT cases only.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Prospective cohort study
Who was studied
Electrophysiologists, Patients
Size
n = 710 procedures (by 32 operators)
Where
Italy, Spain, Croatia, Germany, Switzerland
Summary based on
the full text

What it found

  • Estimated mean annual operator effective dose under fluoroscopy minimization was very low, and no operator reached the 1 mSv pregnancy limit.

    Key figures: 9.34 ± 15.9 µSv per year (annual DAP 46.7 ± 79.5 Gy·cm²)

  • Even under worst-case distance and angulation assumptions, estimated annual dose stayed below 1 mSv.

    Key figures: 448.32 ± 763.2 µSv

  • Most procedures were performed with no fluoroscopy at all.

    Key figures: 555/710 (78%) zero fluoroscopy; 33/710 (5%) near-zero

  • Per-procedure DAP did not differ by operator lifetime experience.

    Key figures: 0.76 vs 2 vs 1.6 Gy·cm², P = 0.66

  • High acute success with few complications.

    Key figures: 693/710 (98%)

Limits to keep in mind

Operator dose was model-derived from patient DAP rather than measured with dosimeters, and only SVT ablations were captured, not operators' full case mix. Non-randomized registry without a conventional-fluoroscopy comparison.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the full text of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.