In plain language
In 999 peripheral therapeutic angiography procedures, a flat panel detector system recorded higher patient dose area product than an older analog image intensifier, despite shorter fluoroscopy times. Staff dose was not measured.
At a glance
- Type of study
- Original research, Retrospective cohort study
- Who was studied
- Patients
- Size
- n = 999 procedures
- Summary based on
- the abstract
What it found
Therapeutic angiographic procedures performed on the flat panel detector system had significantly higher dose area product than on the analog image intensifier.
Dose-area product (DAP) increases with the flat panel detector varied by procedure type, from 31.3% for embolization to 361% for specialized interventions.
Key figures: +100.1% PTA; +39.9% PTA and stent; +187% thrombolysis; +31.3% embolization; +361% specialized interventions
Fluoroscopy times were shorter with the flat panel detector, and DAP differences persisted after standardizing for fluoroscopy duration.
DAP rose with higher body mass index (BMI), with variable effect by intervention.
Limits to keep in mind
This was a single-centre comparison of two imaging systems using patient dose area product only. No staff dose was measured, and the abstract does not report protocol settings or case-mix matching.
Related research summaries
- Fluoroscopy-minimization strategy for catheter ablation of Supraventricular Tachycardia by wOmen OPerators: the STOOP Multicentre Registry (2026, Prospective cohort study)
- Two Central Nervous System Tumors in One Catheter Lab: Time to Rethink Radiation Protection (2026, Retrospective cohort study)
- Radiation Awareness for EVAR in Hybrid Operating Room: An Instant Operator Risk Chart (2021, Dosimetry measurement study)
- Utilization of a Radiation Safety Time-Out Reduces Radiation Exposure During Electrophysiology Procedures (2019, Prospective cohort study)
- Completely nonfluoroscopic catheter ablation of left atrial arrhythmias and ventricular tachycardia (2018, Case report or series)
How this summary was made
ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.
Prepared November 3, 2026.