Research summary, original research, 2026

Real-time phase-dependent occupational radiation exposure analysis in full-endoscopic spine surgery

Kitahara T, Ohshima T, Nakajima D, Watanabe S, Soeda S, Takeuchi M, et al.. Scientific reports. 2026

Read the original paper

In plain language

In 28 endoscopic spine surgeries in Japan, the operating surgeon received far more scatter radiation at chest level than the assistant, supervisor or scrub nurse, mostly during needle and sheath setup. These are over-apron dosimeter readings, not health outcomes.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Dosimetry measurement study
Who was studied
Orthopedic surgeons, Nurses
Size
n = 28 procedures
Where
Japan
Summary based on
the full text

What it found

  • The operator had the highest over-apron chest dose per case, significantly more than the other staff.

    Key figures: median 0.244 mSv [interquartile range (IQR) 0.175-0.413]; p < 0.001

  • Operator dose was concentrated in the Setup phase (local anesthesia, needle puncture, sheath placement), well above the Marking and Check phases.

    Key figures: Phase 2 median 0.194 mSv vs 0.065 mSv (Phase 1) and 0.002 mSv (Phase 3), p < 0.001

  • The scrub nurse received about 1/52 of the operator's over-apron dose.

    Key figures: 0.004 mSv [0.003-0.009]; operator-to-nurse ratio 51.9 (IQR 38.3-71.4)

  • The adjacent assistant received about one-third of the operator's dose.

    Key figures: 0.081 mSv [0.046-0.133]; ratio 3.3

  • Operator total dose did not differ significantly by type of endoscopic procedure.

    Key figures: p = 0.394

Limits to keep in mind

Single-center study of 28 cases with only chest-level over-apron dosimeters, so hand, lens and under-apron doses were not measured and readings do not represent effective dose. No supplemental shielding was used and fluoroscopy mode contributions could not be separated.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the full text of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.