In plain language
In a randomized trial of 52 uterine artery embolizations, using a long sheath that keeps the hub away from the groin roughly halved operator hand dose and slightly lowered thyroid dose, without lengthening procedures.
At a glance
- Type of study
- Original research, Randomized trial
- Who was studied
- Interventional radiologists, Patients
- Size
- n = 52 patients (procedures)
- Summary based on
- the abstract
What it found
Operator left-hand dose was roughly halved with a long (45-cm) sheath compared with a short (11-cm) sheath.
Key figures: 89.5 ± 7.2 μGy vs 186.7 ± 12.6 μGy, p < 0.001
Operator thyroid-level dose was modestly but significantly lower with the long sheath.
Key figures: 54.1 ± 5.5 μGy vs 63.9 ± 7.4 μGy, p < 0.001
Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time did not differ between groups.
Key figures: p > 0.1
The long sheath was partly inserted so its hub sat well away from the groin, moving the operator's hands farther from the radiation field.
Key figures: hub approximately 34 cm caudal to the groin puncture site
Limits to keep in mind
Small single-procedure-type trial with doses measured at only two sites (wrist, thyroid collar); the number of operators, the country, and blinding are not reported in the abstract, and dose rather than health outcomes was measured.
Related research summaries
- Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology (2022, Narrative review)
- Radiation exposure in interventional cardiology: a narrative review of health effects and novel approaches to ensure radiation safety (2025, Narrative review)
- Radiation Exposure, Training, and Safety in Cardiology (2024, Narrative review)
- Occupational Radiation Doses to Operators Performing Fluoroscopically-Guided Procedures (2012, Systematic review)
- AST Standards for Ionizing Radiation Exposure (Guideline or consensus statement)
How this summary was made
ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.
Prepared November 3, 2026.