Research summary, original research, 2015

Radioprotective lightweight caps in the interventional cardiology setting: a randomised controlled trial (PROTECT)

Uthoff H, Quesada R, Roberts JS, Baumann F, Schernthaner M, Zaremski L, et al.. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2015

Read the original paper

In plain language

In a randomised trial among interventional cardiology operators, lightweight XPF caps cut measured radiation reaching the head by about 92-97%, versus 12% with fabric caps, with similar comfort. This is a dosimeter result, not a measure of brain health outcomes.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Randomized trial
Who was studied
Interventional cardiologists
Size
n = 197 procedures (cap measurements)
Summary based on
the abstract

What it found

  • XPF caps of 0.3 mm and 0.5 mm lead equivalence attenuated most of the radiation reaching the head, compared with minimal attenuation by standard fabric caps.

    Key figures: 12.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9-19.1%) standard; 91.5% (95% CI 87.4-95.6%) XPF 0.3 mm; 97.1% (95% CI 92.5-100%) XPF 0.5 mm; p≤0.001

  • Cumulative dose under XPF caps was about one tenth of the dose outside them.

    Key figures: 272 procedures; 22,310 μSv outside vs 2,770 μSv inside

  • Comfort ratings did not differ significantly between XPF and standard caps despite greater weight.

    Key figures: p=0.272

  • XPF caps were roughly ten times heavier than fabric caps.

    Key figures: 12.5 g, 118.4 g, 123.7 g

Limits to keep in mind

Dosimeter-based measurements at the cap rather than brain dose or health outcomes; analysed subsets for protection (n=35-45 per group) were smaller than randomised groups, and country and number of operators are not reported in the abstract.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.