Research summary, original research, 2020

Radiation eye dose to medical staff during respiratory endoscopy under X-ray fluoroscopy

Haga Y, Chida K, Kimura Y, Yamanda S, Sota M, Abe M, et al.. Journal of radiation research. 2020

Read the original paper

In plain language

In one Japanese hospital, physicians performing fluoroscopically guided bronchoscopy received eye doses that in three of eight cases would exceed the 20 mSv/year lens limit; nurses received less. Neck badges tended to underestimate eye dose.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Dosimetry measurement study
Who was studied
Other physicians, Nurses
Size
n = 11 staff (8 physicians, 3 nurses)
Where
Japan
Summary based on
the full text

What it found

  • Bronchoscopy physicians received a mean eye dose about three times that of nurses over six months.

    Key figures: 7.68 ± 5.27 vs 2.41 ± 1.94 mSv/6 months

  • Three of eight physicians exceeded the 20 mSv/year lens dose limit based on estimated annual eye dose; no nurse exceeded it.

    Key figures: 3 of 8 physicians; mean estimated annual dose 15.4 ± 10.5 mSv/y

  • Neck dosimeters worn outside the apron tended to underestimate eye dose compared with the direct eye dosimeter, though neck and eye readings were significantly correlated.

    Key figures: Physicians annual: DOSIRIS 15.4 ± 10.5 vs neck badge 11.1 ± 8.3 mSv/y

  • Left-eye doses were higher than right-eye doses, about 1.7 times in physicians (not statistically significant) and 1.5 times in nurses.

    Key figures: Physicians left 1.35 ± 1.41 vs right 0.81 ± 0.76 mSv/month

  • Nurse eye doses were lower but not negligible; one nurse approached 10 mSv/year.

    Key figures: Nurses annual DOSIRIS 4.81 ± 3.87 mSv/y

Limits to keep in mind

Single-centre study with only 11 staff using an over-the-table X-ray system without lead glasses; annual doses were extrapolated from 6 months and lead glasses were recommended but not tested.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the full text of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.