In plain language
In 126 patients imaged on three generations of X-ray volume imaging systems, the newest system gave lower patient dose and better image quality for cone-beam computed tomography (CT), digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and fluoroscopy. Staff dose was not measured.
At a glance
- Type of study
- Original research, Retrospective cohort study
- Who was studied
- Patients
- Size
- n = 126 patients
- Summary based on
- the abstract
What it found
Recent-generation XVI systems delivered lower mean dose-area product (DAP) and skin entry dose than earlier systems for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), DSA and digital fluoroscopy.
Image noise differed significantly among system generations.
Key figures: P < 0.05
The newest system showed significantly higher CNR and SNR than previous versions.
Dose reduction was attributed to technological advances and fewer frames.
Hounsfield units did not differ between groups except at the hepatic artery.
Limits to keep in mind
Retrospective single-comparison of patient groups across system generations with only 42 patients per group; only patient dose was measured, not staff dose, and numeric results are not given in the abstract.
Related research summaries
- Fluoroscopy-minimization strategy for catheter ablation of Supraventricular Tachycardia by wOmen OPerators: the STOOP Multicentre Registry (2026, Prospective cohort study)
- Two Central Nervous System Tumors in One Catheter Lab: Time to Rethink Radiation Protection (2026, Retrospective cohort study)
- Radiation Awareness for EVAR in Hybrid Operating Room: An Instant Operator Risk Chart (2021, Dosimetry measurement study)
- Utilization of a Radiation Safety Time-Out Reduces Radiation Exposure During Electrophysiology Procedures (2019, Prospective cohort study)
- Completely nonfluoroscopic catheter ablation of left atrial arrhythmias and ventricular tachycardia (2018, Case report or series)
How this summary was made
ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.
Prepared November 3, 2026.