Research summary, original research, 2026

Fundamental evaluation of a novel upright shield to protect medical personnel from scattered radiation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a C-arm system

Ishii H, Chida K, Inaba Y, Onodera S, Kayano S, Sai M. Journal of radiation research. 2026

Read the original paper

In plain language

In a phantom endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) setup, a couch-mounted upright shield cut scattered radiation at operator eye level by 90% and at a seated anesthesiologist's eye level by 86%, provided it was tall enough. Measured staff eye doses in real procedures were not studied.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Phantom or simulation study
Who was studied
Phantom or simulation (no people), Gastroenterologists, Anesthesia staff
Where
Japan
Summary based on
the full text

What it found

  • A 40 cm upright shield on the C-arm reduced scattered radiation at the operator's eye level by 90%.

    Key figures: 90%

  • Shield height was critical: raising it from 30 to 40 cm raised eye-level protection from 33% to 90%, attributed to closing the gap to the image detector.

    Key figures: 33% to 90%

  • The head-side shield gave 86% protection at 100 cm (seated anesthesiologist eye level) but under 10% at 150 cm.

    Key figures: 86% at 100 cm; <10% at 150 cm

  • Without shielding, operator eye-level scatter per kerma-area product (PKA) on the C-arm was 4.7 times that of an over-couch system with an ERCP-specific curtain; the 40 cm shield brought it below the curtain system.

    Key figures: 4.7 times

  • The table-suspended under-curtain alone gave minimal eye-level shielding; the 20 cm shield gave 17% at 150 cm but 98% at 100 cm.

    Key figures: 17% at 150 cm; 98% at 100 cm

Limits to keep in mind

Phantom study with a survey meter measuring H*(10) rather than Hp(3) eye dose, fixed staff positions, single setup; the shield does not cover nurses and clinical staff movement was not assessed.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the full text of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.