Research summary, guideline or consensus statement, 2019

2018 ACC/HRS/NASCI/SCAI/SCCT Expert Consensus Document on Optimal Use of Ionizing Radiation in Cardiovascular Imaging: Best Practices for Safety and Effectiveness: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways

2019

Open the source page

In plain language

This multisociety consensus document reports that interventional cardiologists receive about 8 to 10 μSv per procedure, potentially up to 10 mSv a year, and calls for standardized radiation safety training; the long-term health implications for staff remain uncertain.

At a glance

Type of study
Guideline or consensus statement
Who was studied
Interventional cardiologists, Electrophysiologists, Nurses, Radiologic technologists, Mixed lab staff, Patients
Where
United States
Summary based on
a web page

What it found

  • Interventional cardiologist operator dose per procedure ranges widely, averaging 8 to 10 μSv with current equipment and protection practices.

    Key figures: 0.2 to >100 μSv per procedure; average 8 to 10 μSv

  • An active interventional cardiologist could accumulate up to about 10 mSv per year, or 300 mSv over a 30-year career in an extreme scenario.

    Key figures: 10 mSv/year; 300 mSv over 30 years

  • Interventional cardiologists and electrophysiologists are among the most highly exposed healthcare workers, with potential exposure to support staff too.

  • Health implications of career occupational doses for individual practitioners are uncertain, and no data characterize total exposed workers or their doses.

  • Many cardiovascular specialists are not fully informed about procedural radiation doses and health implications; radiation safety should be built into training and board certification.

Limits to keep in mind

Expert consensus document rather than primary research; the available text was cut short, covering only the preamble and early sections, so recommendations on dose-sparing and protection were not seen.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from a web page of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 5, 2026.