Research summary, original research, 2019

Evaluation of Radiation Exposure on Physicians During Angioplasty for Hemodialysis Access Dysfunction

Huang PS, Chen ZC, Tang KT, Chang WT. Acta Cardiologica Sinica. 2019

Read the original paper

In plain language

In angioplasty for hemodialysis access dysfunction, operator doses to the lens, hands and gonads were higher for central lesions than for arm lesions. Fluoroscopy time did not differ between groups. These are dose measurements, not health outcomes.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Dosimetry measurement study
Who was studied
Other physicians, Patients
Summary based on
the abstract

What it found

  • Operator doses at the lens, hands and gonads were significantly higher when the dialysis access lesion was central rather than in the upper arm or forearm.

  • Radiation dose was significantly higher in the central lesion group than in the upper arm and forearm groups.

  • Total procedure time and fluoroscopy time did not differ among the lesion-site groups, so the dose difference was not explained by longer procedures.

  • Lesions closer to the body centre were associated with higher exposure for both patients and operators.

Limits to keep in mind

Only the abstract was available. It reports no sample size, dose values, statistics or country. The study is a single-procedure-type dosimetry comparison with no health outcomes.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.