Research summary, guideline or consensus statement, 1988

AAPM Report 25 - Radiation Safety Surveys

1988

Open the source page

In plain language

This 1988 American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) protocol sets out how medical physicists should survey x-ray equipment for regulatory compliance, including annual fluoroscopic checks of lead aprons (at least 0.25 mm Pb). It offers no measured staff-dose or health data.

At a glance

Type of study
Guideline or consensus statement
Who was studied
Medical physicists and radiation safety officers
Where
United States
Summary based on
a web page

What it found

  • Protocols provide a unified approach for physicist surveys of radiographic, fluoroscopic, dental and mammographic equipment to verify compliance with federal and state regulations; computed tomography (CT) is excluded.

  • Lead or lead-equivalent aprons and gloves of at least 0.25 mm Pb should be readily available for occupationally exposed personnel.

    Key figures: 0.25 mm Pb

  • Protective apparel should be examined fluoroscopically and checked at least annually, with results documented.

    Key figures: at least annually

  • For mobile units the radiographer should be able to stand at least 6 feet from the x-ray tube during exposure, typically via a six-foot exposure switch cord.

    Key figures: at least 6 feet

  • Each parameter should be checked at least annually or after repairs; heavily used equipment may need semi-annual checks.

    Key figures: annually; semi-annual for heavy use

Limits to keep in mind

A 1988 technical protocol based on regulations and expert consensus, not empirical data on staff dose or health; the available text is cut short before the fluoroscopy and area-radiation sections.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from a web page of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.