Is Alabama an NRC Agreement State?
Yes, since October 1, 1966. The Agreement State program is run by the same Office of Radiation Control within ADPH.
What Alabama's rules say about ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable), dose limits in millisieverts (mSv), dosimeters, aprons and training for the people who work in fluoroscopy labs.
Please double-check this information. This is an ORSIF research summary, researched November 3, 2026. It is not comprehensive and not always accurate: rules change, and answers may be incomplete, out of date or wrong. It is education, not legal advice. Not yet reviewed by a regulatory expert. Confirm each requirement at the source linked beside the answer, with the state program and with your facility's radiation safety officer. How this was made
ORSIF's research identified the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH), Office of Radiation Control (X-Ray Compliance Branch) as the agency that regulates X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment in Alabama. Alabama is a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Agreement State: it has signed an agreement with the NRC to regulate certain radioactive materials itself.
Alabama's X-ray rule (420-3-26-.06) has no ALARA wording. It makes registrants responsible for the shared Standards for Protection Against Radiation rule (.03), whose.03(5)(b) holds the ALARA duty for both materials licensees and X-ray registrants, so an NRC-driven change would reach fluoroscopy users. Dose limits follow the federal model: 50 mSv whole body, 150 mSv lens, 500 mSv skin/extremities, and 5 mSv embryo/fetus. Aprons of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent are required for all in the room except the patient, unless measurements indicate otherwise. The rules are silent on apron alternatives, apron inspection, thyroid shields and eyewear. Alabama does not license radiologic technologists; operators need only be adequately instructed and competent.
Every answer names the rule it comes from. Open "Rule text and source" to read the citation, the source page and, where it could be matched, the exact wording.
Which rules apply, and whether ALARA is among them.
Yes, since October 1, 1966. The Agreement State program is run by the same Office of Radiation Control within ADPH.
Ala. Admin. Code r. 420-3-26-.06 (X-ray/fluoroscopy rule, last amended effective June 24, 2010) and r. 420-3-26-.03 (Standards for Protection Against Radiation, last amended effective Nov 24, 2014, operative Dec 1, 2014). Machine registration is in r. 420-3-26-.05.
this Rule applies to persons licensed or registered by the Agency to receive, possess, use, transfer, or dispose of sources of radiation.This quote was matched word for word to the source page.
Yes, indirectly. The ALARA duty in.03(5)(b) applies to every licensee or registrant, and.06(3)(f)1 makes X-ray registrants responsible for meeting all of Rule.03.
Where ALARA lives in Alabama: Only in a rule shared with radioactive materials. The ALARA requirement and its definition are only in shared rule.03, which covers both materials licensees and X-ray registrants. Rule.06 has no ALARA wording and refers back to.03, so an NRC-driven change to.03(5)(b) would reach fluoroscopy registrants. (r. 420-3-26-.03(3)(g), (5)(b); r. 420-3-26-.06(3)(f)1)
The licensee or registrant shall use, to the extent practical, procedures and engineering controls based upon sound radiation protection principles to achieve occupational doses and public doses that are as low as is reasonably achievable (ALARA).This quote was matched word for word to the source page.
The annual limits for workers, written in millisieverts (mSv). Ten mSv equal one rem.
0.05 Sv (5 rem) = 50 mSv per year TEDE.
0.15 Sv (15 rem) = 150 mSv per year. No lower limit has been adopted.
(i) A lens dose equivalent of 0.15 Sv (15 rem), and (ii) A shallow dose equivalent of 0.5 Sv (50 rem) to the skin or to any extremity.This quote was matched word for word to the source page.
0.5 Sv (50 rem) = 500 mSv per year shallow dose to the skin or any extremity.
(i) A lens dose equivalent of 0.15 Sv (15 rem), and (ii) A shallow dose equivalent of 0.5 Sv (50 rem) to the skin or to any extremity.This quote was matched word for word to the source page.
5 mSv (0.5 rem) to the embryo/fetus of a declared pregnant worker over the whole pregnancy.
When a worker must wear a dosimeter, and where.
Shared rule: adults likely to exceed 10% of the limits must be monitored, as must declared pregnant women likely to exceed 1 mSv over the pregnancy and minors above set thresholds. X-ray rule: every fluoroscopy operator must wear a dosimeter regardless of expected dose; so must anyone likely to receive more than 25 mR per week and mobile unit operators.
Adults likely to receive, in one year from sources external to the body, a dose in excess of 10 percent of the limits in 420-3-26-.03(6)(a)This quote was matched word for word to the source page.
With a single badge, it is worn at the neck outside the apron. A second badge under the apron at the waist is required for a declared pregnant woman and is used for fetal dose. Eye dose is measured at the neck or closer to the eye. Effective dose = 0.3 × neck reading (single badge, if the reading exceeds 25% of the limit), or 1.5 × waist + 0.04 × neck (two badges).
When only one individual monitoring device is used to determine the effective dose equivalent for external radiation pursuant to 420-3-26-.03(6)(C)2., it shall be located at the neck outside the protective apron.This quote was matched word for word to the source page.
Protective apparel, how it is checked, and whether other systems are addressed.
Aprons of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent are required for all persons in the fluoroscopic room except the patient, unless measurements indicate otherwise. The fluoroscopist must wear 0.25 mm lead-equivalent gloves. The rules say nothing about thyroid shields or eyewear.
not found
Not addressed. The apron rule says "unless measurements indicate otherwise," and.06(3)(a) allows waivers only for existing machines or installations where the registrant shows equivalent protection. It is unclear whether ADPH would apply these to engineered systems.
Who may use fluoroscopy equipment and what training the rules ask for.
No license-type list. Operators must be adequately instructed and competent. Exposures require authorization by a licensed practitioner (or PA, CRNP, CNM subject to board rules) with a written order. No supervision rule found in ORC rules. Alabama does not license radiologic technologists.
No American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) certification, state permit, training hours, continuing education (CE) or physician fluoroscopy training are required. The only syllabus (Appendix A to.05) is for servicers, not operators.
Talk about why Alabama does not currently license our professionThis quote was matched word for word to the source page.
Rules, bills and guidance the research found from 2025 and 2026, with the ones that touch fluoroscopy teams first.
restarted with ASRT support; no bill introduced; seeking sponsor (Sep 2026)
The Alabama Society of Radiologic Technologists has restarted its effort to license the profession.
effective (Nov 14, 2021)
Most recent rule revisions listed by ADPH; they changed only.02,.07 and.15, not.03 or.06.
Questions the research could not settle. If you know the answer, tell us.
Copies saved earlier. Rules change, so check the current text at the source.
ORSIF compiled this page from the sources linked on it and did its best. It is not comprehensive and it is not always accurate. Rules change, a rule may have been missed or misread, and the sources themselves can be out of date. Treat this page as a starting point.
Found something wrong or missing? Tell ORSIF.
Found something out of date or wrong? Tell ORSIF. Corrections are checked against the rule text and the page is updated.