In plain language
This review reports that radiation doses to joint replacement surgeons are generally low and within occupational limits, but advises protective equipment, shorter fluoroscopy time, less magnification and greater distance to limit lifetime cumulative exposure.
At a glance
- Type of study
- Narrative review
- Who was studied
- Orthopedic surgeons
- Summary based on
- the abstract
What it found
Radiation dose to arthroplasty surgeons is reported as low and within occupational exposure limits.
Because effects are stochastic, no exposure level is considered truly safe.
Fluoroscopy use in arthroplasty is increasing with the popularity of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Authors recommend protective equipment, minimizing fluoroscopy time and magnification, and maximizing distance.
Limits to keep in mind
Narrative review summarized from the abstract only; no quantitative data, search methods, or study counts are reported.
Related research summaries
- Radiation in the Orthopedic Operating Room: What We Know, What We Do, and What Needs Attention (2025, Narrative review)
- IU Health Handbook of Fluoroscopy Safety (Guideline or consensus statement)
- Radiation exposure in interventional cardiology: a narrative review of health effects and novel approaches to ensure radiation safety (2025, Narrative review)
- Radiation Safety in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (2025, Narrative review)
- Addressing the Occupational Risk of Radiation Exposure in the Evolving Field of Interventional Echocardiography (2024, Narrative review)
How this summary was made
ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.
Prepared November 3, 2026.