Research summary, systematic review or meta-analysis, 2026

A Systematic Review on Occupational Exposure to Ionizing Radiation During Standard and Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Procedures

Efthymiou FO, Pitros CF, Metaxas VI, Dimitroukas CP, Antonopoulos CN, Kakkos SK, et al.. Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2026

Read the original paper

In plain language

Across 18 studies of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), staff radiation doses varied widely. Operators' left eye and hand received more dose, and scrub nurses received more than circulating nurses. Image fusion, dual fluoroscopy with zoom and suspended shielding were associated with lower staff dose.

At a glance

Type of study
Systematic review or meta-analysis, Systematic review
Who was studied
Vascular surgeons, Nurses, Mixed lab staff
Size
n = 18 studies
Summary based on
the abstract

What it found

  • Occupational dose during EVAR varied widely across the 18 included studies.

    Key figures: ED 0.40 to 4350.00 μSv; Hp(3) 0.25 to 2500.00 μSv

  • Operator exposure was consistently higher on the left side for eyes and hands.

    Key figures: left eye 200.00 vs right eye 30.00 μSv; left hand 76.90 vs right hand 46.70 μSv

  • 3D image fusion reduced operator effective dose, and dual fluoroscopy with digital zoom lowered median doses.

    Key figures: 55% to 66% (fusion); 62% (dual fluoroscopy with zoom)

  • Suspended lead shielding systems eliminated axillary exposure in some cases.

  • Supporting staff received lower but non-negligible doses; scrub nurses received more than circulating nurses.

Limits to keep in mind

Abstract only; included studies were observational and heterogeneous in dosimetric metrics and reporting, which prevented pooling, and the search was limited to 2019-2025 English-language publications.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.