The Evidence
Resources
Clinician AssessmentGet Your Risk Score FAQs Admin ToolkitMembers Economic Impact Research ArticlesMembers SIRP 2025 WebinarMembers Videos
Guidelines
What is ALARA+? US Guidelines International Guidelines News Is Not Here About Contact Donate
Join Free

Please double-check this information. This is an ORSIF research summary, researched November 3, 2026. It is not comprehensive and not always accurate: rules change, and answers may be incomplete, out of date or wrong. It is education, not legal advice. Not yet reviewed by a regulatory expert. Confirm each requirement at the source linked beside the answer, with the state program and with your facility's radiation safety officer. How this was made

In brief

ORSIF's research identified the Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control, Radiation Machine Program as the agency that regulates X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment in Florida. Florida is a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Agreement State: it has signed an agreement with the NRC to regulate certain radioactive materials itself.

Florida's ALARA requirement applies to X-ray registrants, including fluoroscopy users, through the general radiation protection rule (Part III of Chapter 64E-5), which also covers radioactive-materials licensees. The X-ray part (Part V) has no ALARA wording of its own. Florida uses the standard US dose limits: 50 mSv a year whole body, 150 mSv lens of the eye (the lower International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 20 mSv limit has not been adopted), 500 mSv skin and extremities, and 5 mSv to the embryo/fetus. Staff must be protected by aprons "or whole body protective barriers" of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent, and a badge is worn at the collar outside the apron. No rule addresses engineered systems used in place of aprons by name, and no apron-inspection requirement was found. Fluoroscopy may be performed by licensed practitioners, certified radiologist assistants, and, under conditions, certified general radiographers. The statute's wider list of who may operate does not match the rule text exactly.

The rules, question by question

Every answer names the rule it comes from. Open "Rule text and source" to read the citation, the source page and, where it could be matched, the exact wording.

Where the rules live

Which rules apply, and whether ALARA is among them.

Is Florida an NRC Agreement State?

Yes

Yes. Florida is not among the non-Agreement jurisdictions on the NRC list (updated 2026-10-29), and a Florida rulemaking notice for 64E-5.101 refers to Florida's agreement with the NRC.

Rule text and source
Rule
NRC list of Agreement States, updated October 29, 2026; flrules.org rule history for 64E-5.101
Source
nrc.gov
flrules.org
What it says
All changes described herein are needed to comply with the requirements of Florida's agreement state compact with the U.S.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Which rules cover X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment in Florida?

Yes

Chapter 64E-5, F.A.C., "Control of Radiation Hazard Regulations." Part III (64E-5.301-.3xx) holds the general Standards for Protection Against Radiation and applies to both licensees and registrants. Part V (64E-5.501-.511) covers X-ray machines, including 64E-5.502 General Requirements (effective 3/21/2016) and 64E-5.504 Fluoroscopic X-Ray Systems (effective 5/8/2013). Operator certification is in Chapter 468, Part IV, F.S. and Chapter 64E-3, F.A.C. The text was read in the department's compiled version (Revision 15, March 21, 2016), which is not the official F.A.C. itself.

Rule text and source
Rule
64E-5.301(2), F.A.C.
Source
floridahealth.gov
flrules.org
What it says
Except as specifically provided in other parts of these rules, this part applies to persons licensed or registered by the department to receive, possess, use, or transfer sources of radiation.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Does Florida require X-ray users to keep doses as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)?

Yes

Yes. Registrants must use procedures and engineering controls to achieve occupational doses that are ALARA, and must have a written radiation protection program reviewed every 12 months. Dental and podiatry registrants are exempt from the program and review duties (64E-5.303(4)) but not from the ALARA sentence. Rule 64E-5.303 has been in effect since 10/8/2000.

Where ALARA lives in Florida: Only in a rule shared with radioactive materials. The ALARA duty is in Part III (64E-5.303(2)), which applies to "licensee or registrant" alike, and the definition is in Part I (64E-5.101(11)). Part V (X-ray) contains no "reasonably achievable" or "ALARA" wording; it only points back to Part III dose limits, and its "minimize exposure" language concerns patients. A separate ALARA program rule (64E-5.604) applies only to medical radioactive-materials licensees. An NRC-driven change to the Part III ALARA language would, as written, also reach X-ray registrants unless Florida writes separate X-ray wording. (64E-5.101(11); 64E-5.303(2); 64E-5.604)

Rule text and source
Rule
64E-5.303(2), F.A.C.
Source
floridahealth.gov
What it says
The licensee or registrant shall use to the extent practical procedures and engineering controls based upon sound radiation protection principles to achieve occupational doses and public doses that are as low as reasonably achievable.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Dose limits

The annual limits for workers, written in millisieverts (mSv). Ten mSv equal one rem.

What is the annual eye-lens dose limit in Florida?

Yes

15 rem (150 mSv) per year. The lower ICRP 20 mSv limit has not been adopted.

Rule text and source
Rule
64E-5.304(1)(b)
Source
floridahealth.gov
What it says
An lens dose equivalent of 15 rem (0.15 sievert), and
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What limit applies to a declared pregnant worker in Florida?

Yes

0.5 rem (5 mSv) to the embryo/fetus of a declared pregnant worker over the whole pregnancy, with no more than 0.05 rem (0.5 mSv) recommended in any one month.

Rule text and source
Rule
64E-5.311(1)
Source
floridahealth.gov
What it says
does not exceed 0.5 rem (5 mSv).
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Dosimeters

When a worker must wear a dosimeter, and where.

When must a worker in Florida wear a dosimeter?

YesCheck the source

Individual dosimeters must be supplied and required for: adults likely to receive more than 10% of the 64E-5.304(1) limits in a year (by this research's calculation, 5 mSv whole body, 15 mSv lens, or 50 mSv skin/extremity); declared pregnant women likely to receive more than 0.1 rem (1 mSv) deep dose over the pregnancy; minors above lower thresholds; and anyone entering high or very high radiation areas. Rule 64E-5.315 was last amended 12/26/2013.

Rule text and source
Rule
64E-5.315(1)(a)-(d)
Source
floridahealth.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Where must the dosimeter be worn in Florida when a protective apron is worn?

Yes

When an apron is worn, at least one dosimeter goes at the collar outside the apron; if more than one is used, each reading must be recorded with where it was worn. Deep dose is used in place of effective dose unless a department-approved dosimetry method is used. Information Notice 4 (rev. January 2022) requires a written request and approval before a correction factor is applied; the method must come from a published, peer-reviewed source and be accepted by a standards or consensus body (e.g., National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), AAPM, ACR, ICRP, IAEA). The notice does not name NCRP Report 122 or Webster. Declared pregnant workers wear a waist monitor under the apron plus one outside it.

Rule text and source
Rule
64E-5.502(1)(a)10.a; 64E-5.304(3); Information Notice 4
Source
floridahealth.gov
floridahealth.gov
What it says
When a protective apron is worn, the monitoring device shall be worn at the collar outside of the apron
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Aprons and alternatives

Protective apparel, how it is checked, and whether other systems are addressed.

Must staff in Florida fluoroscopy rooms wear protective aprons or other apparel?

Yes

Only staff needed for the procedure may be in the room. Staff must be protected from direct scatter by aprons or whole-body protective barriers of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent, and any body part in the useful beam needs 0.5 mm lead equivalent. No thyroid shield or eyewear requirement was found, though the department may require additional protective devices where stray radiation could give one-fourth of the maximum permissible dose. Under the fluoroscopy rule, scatter reaching staff (except extremities) must pass through at least 0.25 mm lead equivalent unless the person is at least 120 cm from the center of the beam. The 64E-5.502(1)(a)4 requirement is worded "during the radiographic exposure."

Rule text and source
Rule
64E-5.502(1)(a)4.a-d; 64E-5.504(9)
Source
floridahealth.gov
What it says
Staff and ancillary personnel shall be protected from the direct scatter radiation by protective aprons or whole body protective barriers of not less than 0.25 millimeter lead equivalent.
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Do the rules in Florida address engineered protection systems used in place of aprons?

UnclearLess certain

Not addressed by name; no Florida rule or bill on "radiation protection systems" was found. The rule allows aprons "or whole body protective barriers," and a protective barrier is defined as "a barrier containing radiation absorbing material used to reduce radiation exposure." 64E-5.504(9)(b) is written as an equipment-configuration requirement, and Information Notice 4 refers to "protective aprons or other personal protective radiation barriers." Whether an engineered system meets the "whole body protective barrier" wording is not settled in any source found.

Rule text and source
Rule
64E-5.502(1)(a)4.b; 64E-5.501 definition "Protective barrier"
Source
floridahealth.gov
What it says
Fluoroscopic equipment configuration shall be such that no portion of any staff or ancillary person's body, except the extremities, shall be exposed to the unattenuated scattered radiation emanating from above the tabletop unless:
This quote was matched word for word to the source page.

About ALARA+

Who operates the equipment

Who may use fluoroscopy equipment and what training the rules ask for.

Who may operate fluoroscopy equipment in Florida?

In partCheck the source

Under the rule (added 2007), fluoroscopy may be performed only by a licensed practitioner (medicine, osteopathic medicine, podiatric medicine/chiropody, naturopathy or chiropractic), a certified radiologist assistant, or a certified general radiographer trained and authorized in writing by the practitioner in charge, for imaging that does not rely on the radiographer for interpretation. Physician assistants and nurse practitioners are not listed. Certified technologists work under direct or general supervision of a licensed practitioner; radiologist assistants work under a radiologist, with fluoroscopy as a "General" supervision duty per 64E-3.0032. The statute is broader in two places that no source reconciles: 468.302(3)(a) lets basic X-ray machine operators perform "general fluoroscopic procedures" under direct supervision, and 468.302(6)(c) exempts cardiopulmonary technology staff under direct supervision from certification. The 2026 statute text is unchanged (amendment history ends in 2012).

Rule text and source
Rule
64E-5.502(1)(a)9.e; ss. 468.301, 468.302, F.S.; 64E-3.0032
Source
floridahealth.gov
flsenate.gov
flsenate.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

What training or credentials does Florida require to operate fluoroscopy equipment?

YesCheck the source

All operators must be instructed in and competent in safe use; medical operators must be certified or authorized under Chapter 468, Part IV. General radiographers obtain state certification by an American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT)-administered exam after a two-year accredited program. Basic X-ray machine operators take an ARRT-administered exam with no formal program required. Continuing education is 12 hours per two-year renewal cycle (64E-3.008-.010), and the statute caps continuing education (CE) at 24 hours. For fluoroscopy, general radiographers need written authorization from the practitioner in charge. No state fluoroscopy permit, set number of fluoroscopy training hours, or physician fluoroscopy training requirement was found.

Rule text and source
Rule
64E-5.502(1)(a)2; s. 468.304, 468.309, F.S.; 64E-3
Source
floridahealth.gov
floridahealth.gov
flsenate.gov

Why this matters, in ORSIF's FAQs

Changes on the way, and recent ones

Rules, bills and guidance the research found from 2025 and 2026, with the ones that touch fluoroscopy teams first.

  • Proposed ruleProposed rule, 64E-5.101 (Definitions) and 64E-5.102 (Exemptions)

    Published 9/1/2026 (FAR Vol. 52/170); comments closed 9/22/2026; Notice of Change followed on 10/27/2026 (Vol. 52/209) (Sep 1, 2026)

    Keeps pace with NRC requirements, adds phosphate-mining-land definitions (HB 167, ch. 2026-103), and adds common-carrier exemptions. The ALARA definition (subsection 11) is marked "No change" in the proposed text. The text of the 10/27/2026 Notice of Change could not be opened.

    Source: flrules.org

1 other item the research logged (radiation therapy, industrial machines, fees and other subjects)
  • OtherDepartment of Health 2026-27 Annual Regulatory Plan

    Rulemaking expected by July 1, 2027

    Lists rulemaking on several Part III and radioactive-materials rules, including 64E-5.314 ("Improve coordination with other agencies"). It does not list 64E-5.303,.304,.315,.502 or.504. Part III rules (.301-.319) are scheduled for periodic review in 2028-29 and Part V rules (.501,.503-.511) in 2027-28.

    Source: floridahealth.gov

Also worth knowing

  • A declared pregnant worker must wear a waist monitor under protective clothing, plus one outside it (64E-5.311(5)).
  • Information Notice 4 says doses from different facilities are added as recorded, whether or not each facility applies a correction factor. This matters for physicians working at several sites.
  • The scatter-shielding requirement can be waived for special procedures where a sterile field prevents normal barriers, but not where prefitted sterile covers are practical (64E-5.504(9)(c)).
  • The department inspects machines on a use-based schedule; owners have 90 days to fix non-urgent deficiencies.
  • A 2025 PMC review lists Florida as requiring 0.50 mm aprons, but the rule text says 0.25 mm for staff, with 0.5 mm only for body parts in the useful beam.
  • No 2025-2026 bill was found that changes fluoroscopy operator rules or addresses apron alternatives.
  • The department reports more than 64,000 registered X-ray machines.

What ORSIF could not confirm

Questions the research could not settle. If you know the answer, tell us.

  • The rule text comes from the department's compiled version (2016). Confirm it against the official VIEW_RULE text on flrules.org for 64E-5.303,.304,.315,.502 and.504.
  • The Notice of Change (10/27/2026, FAR Vol. 52/209) could not be opened. Check whether it touches the ALARA definition or Part III.
  • Who may operate: the rule does not line up with 468.302(3)(a) (basic X-ray machine operators may do "general fluoroscopic procedures") or 468.302(6)(c) (cardiopulmonary technology exemption). Ask the Bureau of Radiation Control, (850) 245-4888, how inspectors apply these in cath and EP labs, and whether physician assistants or nurse practitioners may activate fluoroscopy.
  • Engineered systems: whether a ceiling-suspended or engineered system counts as a "whole body protective barrier" under 64E-5.502(1)(a)4.b. No written guidance was found; ask the Radiation Machine Program.
  • Apron inspection: whether the Bureau's inspection checklists or unpublished guidance require it. Ask the department or check its inspection procedures.
  • Whether Florida plans any response to the NRC's July 2026 proposed Part 20 "graded approach" rule. The 2026-27 regulatory plan does not mention it; watch the Florida Administrative Register for 64E-5.303 notices.

Who regulates, and where to read the rules

Documents ORSIF has on file

Copies saved earlier. Rules change, so check the current text at the source.

  • Chapter 468 Part IV - Radiological Personnel Download
  • 64E-5 Part V - Fluoroscopic X-ray Systems Download
  • Control of Radiation Hazard Regs (NRC Archive) Download

Double-check before you rely on this page

ORSIF compiled this page from the sources linked on it and did its best. It is not comprehensive and it is not always accurate. Rules change, a rule may have been missed or misread, and the sources themselves can be out of date. Treat this page as a starting point.

Where to check

What may be missing here

  • 2 of 14 answers on this page are "Not found" or "Unclear". That means ORSIF did not find the answer in the rules it reviewed, not that no rule exists.
  • 5 answers carry a flag or a lower confidence ("Check the source" or "Less certain").
  • Researched November 3, 2026. Rules may have changed since.
  • Only the state's rules for X-ray and fluoroscopy equipment were reviewed.

Found something wrong or missing? Tell ORSIF.

Sources and terms

Terms used on this page
ALARA
As low as reasonably achievable: keep radiation doses as low as is reasonable, below the legal limits.
Agreement State
A state that has signed an agreement with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to regulate certain radioactive materials itself.
mSv
Millisievert, a unit of radiation dose. Ten mSv equal one rem, the older unit some rules still use.
Dosimeter
A badge or device worn to measure a worker's radiation dose.
Lead equivalent
The thickness of lead (mm Pb) that would give the same protection as the material described.
NRC
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
ICRP
International Commission on Radiological Protection
NCRP
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements
TEDE
Total effective dose equivalent
ARRT
American Registry of Radiologic Technologists
CE
Continuing education
All 17 sources the research read

Found something out of date or wrong? Tell ORSIF. Corrections are checked against the rule text and the page is updated.