Research summary, original research, 2023

Time to Look for Ergonomically Viable Designs of Radiation Protection Aprons: A Survey of 416 Orthopedic Surgeons

Jaiman A, Prakash J, Chopra RK, Neogi DS. Cureus. 2023

Read the original paper

In plain language

In a self-reported survey of 416 orthopedic surgeons, few were satisfied with apron or thyroid shield designs, thyroid shields were often skipped or forgotten, and most reported back or neck pain; lighter and wrap-around aprons were rated more favorably.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Cross-sectional survey
Who was studied
Orthopedic surgeons
Size
n = 416 orthopedic surgeons
Summary based on
the full text

What it found

  • Only a small minority of orthopedic surgeons were satisfied with current apron design; heaviness was the most common problem.

    Key figures: 9.6% satisfied; 58.4% reported heaviness

  • Thyroid shields were worn far less often than aprons and were frequently forgotten or found uncomfortable.

    Key figures: 20.4% wore thyroid shields most of the time vs 91.1% for aprons; 37.3% always forgot thyroid shields

  • About 63% of respondents reported back or neck pain, similar to rates reported for interventional radiologists.

    Key figures: 63%

  • Lead-free and lead vinyl aprons were rated more comfortable than lead-based aprons; single-sided aprons were associated with more back pain than wrap-around types.

    Key figures: 40% and 46.7% vs 24% comfortable (p<0.01); back pain 37.7% vs 31% (p=0.05)

  • Most surgeons reported sweating while wearing aprons, more often in government hospitals.

    Key figures: 78.4% (326/416)

Limits to keep in mind

Cross-sectional, self-reported survey with an unvalidated questionnaire, male-predominant respondents and countries not specified; back pain is multifactorial and confounders were not controlled, so causation cannot be inferred.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the full text of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.