In plain language
A joint European society statement reviews radiation risk during pregnancy for cath lab and electrophysiology (EP) professionals, noting that fear of foetal exposure deters women from these careers, and proposes workplace safety and equity measures.
At a glance
- Type of study
- Guideline or consensus statement
- Who was studied
- Interventional cardiologists, Electrophysiologists, Mixed lab staff
- Topics
- Pregnancy and reproductive healthWomen in the fieldWorkforce and careersRegulation and policySafety culture and compliance
- Summary based on
- the abstract
What it found
Surveys show radiation exposure is commonly reported as the primary barrier for women pursuing careers in interventional cardiology or electrophysiology.
Fear of foetal radiation exposure during pregnancy may cause prolonged career interruption.
The statement reviews radiation risk and existing data on cardiologists who kept working in cath labs throughout pregnancy.
The document proposes measures to improve workplace safety and encourage equity.
Limits to keep in mind
Consensus statement based on literature review and expert opinion rather than new data; only the abstract was available, so specific recommendations and dose figures are not reported here.
Related research summaries
- SCAI Multi-Society Position Statement on Occupational Health Hazards (2020, Guideline or consensus statement)
- ALARA+: Summit on Radiation and Orthopedic Risks in Fluoroscopic Laboratories (2026, Guideline or consensus statement)
- Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in pregnant staff: Consensus document (Spanish societies) (2023, Guideline or consensus statement)
- Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory (2011, Guideline or consensus statement)
- SCAI Consensus Document on Occupational Radiation Exposure to the Pregnant Cardiologist and Technical Personnel (2011, Guideline or consensus statement)
How this summary was made
ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.
Prepared November 3, 2026.