Research summary, original research, 2015

Neuropsychological Testing in Interventional Cardiology Staff after Long-Term Exposure to Ionizing Radiation

Marazziti D, Tomaiuolo F, Dell'Osso L, Demi V, Campana S, Piccaluga E, et al.. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS. 2015

Read the original paper

In plain language

Cardiologists and nurses working in cath labs scored lower on some memory and verbal fluency tests than unexposed controls. No dose-response was found, so radiation has not been shown to cause the difference.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Cross-sectional survey
Who was studied
Interventional cardiologists, Nurses, Mixed lab staff
Size
n = 166 participants (83 exposed, 83 controls)
Summary based on
the abstract

What it found

  • Cath lab cardiologists and nurses scored significantly lower than unexposed controls on delayed recall, visual short-term memory and semantic lexical access.

    Key figures: 83 exposed vs 83 controls

  • No dose-response relationship was detected.

  • The authors suggest the reduced skills point to alterations in left hemisphere structures, which are more exposed in interventional cardiology staff.

  • The authors recommend head protection as mandatory good practice for invasive cardiology personnel.

Limits to keep in mind

This is an observational comparison of exposed and unexposed groups, so confounding cannot be excluded, and no dose-response was found. The abstract gives no detail on country, how controls were matched or how exposure was measured.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.