Research summary, original research, 2018

Implementation of a near-zero fluoroscopy approach in interventional electrophysiology: impact of operator experience

Wannagat S, Loehr L, Lask S, Völk K, Karaköse T, Özcelik C, et al.. Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing. 2018

Read the original paper

In plain language

In 157 ablation patients at two centres, a near-zero fluoroscopy approach using 3-D mapping cut dose area product by about 90% for operators from beginner to expert, without longer procedures or more complications. Staff dose was not measured directly.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Retrospective cohort study
Who was studied
Electrophysiologists, Trainees, Patients
Size
n = 157 patients
Summary based on
the abstract

What it found

  • Dose area product fell by about 90% soon after a near-zero fluoroscopy approach using 3-D mapping was introduced, including among operators in training.

    Key figures: 90% reduction of DPA

  • All four operators, from beginner to expert, had significantly lower dose area product than the historical fluoroscopy-guided control group.

    Key figures: control 637 ± 611 μGy/m2; beginner 44.1 ± 79.5 μGy/m2, p = 0.002; 1st year fellow 24.3 ± 46.4.5 μGy/m2, p = 0.001; 2nd year fellow 130.3 ± 233.3 μGy/m2, p = 0.003; expert 9.3 ± 37.4 μGy/m2, P < 0.001

  • Procedure duration, acute success and complications did not differ significantly between the near-zero fluoroscopy and control groups.

  • The comparison was 100 fluoroscopy-guided procedures against 57 near-zero fluoroscopy procedures across two centres.

    Key figures: 157 patients; 100 control, 57 near-zero fluoroscopy

Limits to keep in mind

Small non-randomized study comparing against a historical control, with only four operators and 57 intervention procedures. Only patient dose area product was measured; staff doses were not directly measured.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.