Research summary, original research, 2013

Cytogenetic endpoints and Xenobiotic gene polymorphism in lymphocytes of hospital workers chronically exposed to ionizing radiation in Cardiology, Radiology and Orthopedic Laboratories

Vellingiri B, Shanmugam S, Subramaniam MD, Balasubramanian B, Meyyazhagan A, Alagamuthu K, et al.. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. 2013

Read the original paper

In plain language

Among 56 hospital workers exposed to low-dose radiation in cardiology, radiology and orthopedic labs in Tamil Nadu, chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei were higher than in 56 matched controls, most in cardiology lab staff. These are biomarker associations, not proven health effects.

At a glance

Type of study
Original research, Laboratory or biomarker study
Who was studied
Mixed lab staff, General population
Size
n = 112 subjects (56 exposed, 56 controls)
Where
India
Summary based on
the abstract

What it found

  • Exposed hospital workers had higher chromosomal aberration and micronucleus frequencies than controls, with cardiology laboratory workers highest.

    Key figures: p<0.05

  • Cardiology laboratory workers showed greater DNA damage on Comet assay than radiology and orthopedic laboratory workers.

  • Work duration and age were statistically significant factors in multiple linear regression analysis.

  • GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotype frequencies were reported; no significant difference in allele frequencies between exposed and controls was stated, though the reported p-value appears inconsistent.

    Key figures: 39.3 percent and 14.3 percent; p=0.0128

Limits to keep in mind

Small cross-sectional biomarker comparison of exposed workers with matched controls from one Indian state, with no individual dose data reported in the abstract; cytogenetic markers are not health outcomes and confounding was only partly addressed.

How this summary was made

ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.

Prepared November 3, 2026.