In plain language
This review summarizes traditional and newer ways to lower radiation exposure for the cath lab team and patients, and notes that lead aprons themselves contribute to orthopedic injuries. The abstract gives no specific effect sizes.
At a glance
- Type of study
- Narrative review
- Who was studied
- Interventional cardiologists, Mixed lab staff, Patients
- Topics
- Personal protective equipmentRoom shielding and protective devicesMusculoskeletal injury and ergonomicsDose reduction techniquesPatient dose
- Summary based on
- the abstract
What it found
Radiation during cardiac catheterization poses risks to patients and staff, including orthopedic injuries from lead aprons.
The review summarizes recent advances and the effectiveness of traditional and novel radiation protection strategies and equipment.
Limits to keep in mind
Narrative review; only a brief abstract is available, with no specific data or comparative effect sizes.
Related research summaries
- Radiation Exposure, Training, and Safety in Cardiology (2024, Narrative review)
- Practical guidance to reduce radiation exposure in electrophysiology applying ultra low-dose protocols: a European Heart Rhythm Association review (2023, Narrative review)
- Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology (2022, Narrative review)
- Radiation Safety in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (2025, Narrative review)
- Radiation protection practices in diagnostic and interventional cardiology: Position paper from Portuguese Association of Interventional Cardiology (2025, Guideline or consensus statement)
How this summary was made
ORSIF prepared this summary with AI assistance from the abstract of the paper. A program then checked that the passage supporting each finding appears word for word in that source. A person has not yet reviewed each summary, so read the original before relying on a number. ORSIF summarizes research and does not endorse any product or company. Report a problem with this summary.
Prepared November 3, 2026.